by nightowl » Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:11 am
Yes, I know it is reported that she gives out secs. That is what I originally had this entire thread based on. But now that there is an IP autograph that mine can be compared to I have had an opportuntiy to study them more closely.
That's also why I put three question marks in my subject title, as to suggest: Are they real?
Before now I could not find a good signature for comparison. But now that I do have one I can see that my autographs do very much resemble the IP presented here.
What I am comparing is the transitional points in the loops where they turn back on themselves. These possess very unique qualities that would not easily be reproduced over five matching points, when drawn in quick succession. Those tend to be unique qualites of the person writing the letter.
As you would have your own specific way that you would shape any given letter when drawn quickly, a shape that would come naturally to you as you move your hand through the letter being drawn. Someone else now trying to copy that would have to rearrange the way they draw theirs in an attempt to make it look like yours. The tendency would be that if they did it quickly that the way they would draw it would be more likely to have qualities matching their own to come through in that rapid movement.
With a great deal of practice it can come to resemble what they are trying to copy. What makes this unique is that it is all done quickly in one rapid movement. Were it to be done slowly you would see a more forced appearance, a shakiness or thickening of the lines, rather than the flowing lines that we see here.
What I am saying is that for someone to draw this quickly, trying to match up the specific shape of those five points, that I am referring to, would very difficult to do.
Yes, I know it is reported that she gives out secs. That is what I originally had this entire thread based on. But now that there is an IP autograph that mine can be compared to I have had an opportuntiy to study them more closely.
That's also why I put three question marks in my subject title, as to suggest: Are they real?
Before now I could not find a good signature for comparison. But now that I do have one I can see that my autographs do very much resemble the IP presented here.
What I am comparing is the transitional points in the loops where they turn back on themselves. These possess very unique qualities that would not easily be reproduced over five matching points, when drawn in quick succession. Those tend to be unique qualites of the person writing the letter.
As you would have your own specific way that you would shape any given letter when drawn quickly, a shape that would come naturally to you as you move your hand through the letter being drawn. Someone else now trying to copy that would have to rearrange the way they draw theirs in an attempt to make it look like yours. The tendency would be that if they did it quickly that the way they would draw it would be more likely to have qualities matching their own to come through in that rapid movement.
With a great deal of practice it can come to resemble what they are trying to copy. What makes this unique is that it is all done quickly in one rapid movement. Were it to be done slowly you would see a more forced appearance, a shakiness or thickening of the lines, rather than the flowing lines that we see here.
What I am saying is that for someone to draw this quickly, trying to match up the specific shape of those five points, that I am referring to, would very difficult to do.
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur