[quote="lizard"][quote="Nadine"]I could post more scans, but I don't want to ruin janetka's great success, so I'll leave it at that! Hope this helps though!

@lizard. Thanks for your kind answer. I believe the signatures are real. I have got an answer from Bradley, too. Also from the A-Team Set and
I think its ok :-) {up}

Here is my picture:

http://img682.imageshack.us/i/bradle.jpg/[/quote]
Of course, no problem Nadine! :) If my success is waiting for me at home (keeping my fingers crossed), I'll post scans in my topic to compare to! {up} I love the photo you sent, it's great!!

Enjoy & best to you![/quote]

I believe the signature from Bradley is real from him :-) {up}
Thank you, I wish you all the best, too and a merry christmas :-)
kind regards, Nadine

Alright, I will post my scans then. It was not like I was looking for any of the similarities below, because that's when you start seeing things to support your own beliefs, however, as I was looking at the notes to "Don", and then I saw a TTM auto to him (like the so-called sec ones), and that's when I saw similarities, which to my knowledge, cannot be secretarial signed:

Here's two similarities in the following examples (see red circles), note the "e" (almost no hole in the loop), and the similar "nn":
[url=http://img3.imageshack.us/i/bc1u.jpg/][img]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7360/bc1u.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img706.imageshack.us/i/showscanbc1php.jpg/][img]http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/139/showscanbc1php.th.jpg[/img][/url]

Similar handwriting in "To:
[url=http://img22.imageshack.us/i/bc2b.jpg/][img]http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/7412/bc2b.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img138.imageshack.us/i/bc8.jpg/][img]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/2909/bc8.th.jpg[/img][/url]

Note the similar form of the capital "N" in the below examples, and also compare the way "all" matches to in person ones (see below):
[url=http://img710.imageshack.us/i/bc3.jpg/][img]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/89/bc3.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img3.imageshack.us/i/bc5t.jpg/][img]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/1592/bc5t.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img6.imageshack.us/i/bc4u.jpg/][img]http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/637/bc4u.th.jpg[/img][/url]

Here you can see the similar "R":
[url=http://img138.imageshack.us/i/bc7.jpg/][img]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9114/bc7.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img3.imageshack.us/i/bc6.jpg/][img]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7513/bc6.th.jpg[/img][/url]

Another two scans, note how the small "n" matches a bit, same loop at the top:
[url=http://img7.imageshack.us/i/bc10v.jpg/][img]http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/4249/bc10v.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img710.imageshack.us/i/bc9.jpg/][img]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/9223/bc9.th.jpg[/img][/url]

Same capital "A":
[url=http://img63.imageshack.us/i/bcauto2q.jpg/][img]http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/2359/bcauto2q.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img64.imageshack.us/i/bcauto1.jpg/][img]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/1330/bcauto1.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://g.imageshack.us/img64/bcauto1.jpg/1/][img]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/bcauto1.jpg/1/w290.png[/img][/url]

Now below, take note of the interesting way the "r" matches (this is just two examples, but in every example, it is the same):
[url=http://img710.imageshack.us/i/bcauto4.jpg/][img]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/6208/bcauto4.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img696.imageshack.us/i/bcauto3.jpg/][img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/6214/bcauto3.th.jpg[/img][/url]

See the capital "C":
[url=http://img6.imageshack.us/i/bc4u.jpg/][img]http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/637/bc4u.th.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://img64.imageshack.us/i/showscanbcphp1.jpg/][img]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/1296/showscanbcphp1.jpg[/img][/url][url=http://g.imageshack.us/img64/showscanbcphp1.jpg/1/][img]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/showscanbcphp1.jpg/1/w480.png[/img][/url]

There are more similarities in handwriting, such as the '-ing' in "watching" (see inscriptions), etc.

Decide for yourself, but from the above, I can't see that a sec signed it... And way back in 2006, when he was barely known (except for "Alias"), he used a sec - sorry, I don't think so...

Hi there,

Unfortunately I strongly believe these to be secretarial. Yes, these do match his TTM Broadway signatures from a few years ago, but they do not match some older TTM successes that do match his IP signature. Plus, his IP signature is less "messy" than these TTMs that have been coming back, which would be extremely odd, and the IP and old authentic TTM's all look very similar to each other and nothing like the ones from Broadway or A-Team. Thus, I have no choice but to say that these are secretarial.

dansautos


[quote="lizard"][quote="Nadine"]Hi,
do you think the signature is real from Bradley?
Some people discuss in another forum that the A-Team signatures are fake....[/quote]
Hi Nadine! ;)

I know some people doubt the authenticity, but honestly, I am very convinced [b]all his replies are authentic signed by Bradley[/b]. I've been gathering scans and comparing it for weeks now, and there is an obvious resemblance between the VV ones and in person autographs. {up} Also, how come the Broadway successes back in 2006 match perfectly to recent feedback? It's a well-known fact that Broadway doesn't send out sec's during the course of the play (and the feedback was received during production, not after and neither was it forwarded to another city). Just search the "Via Venue Feedback" forum to see those successes! :)

I could post more scans, but I don't want to ruin janetka's great success, so I'll leave it at that! Hope this helps though! :D[/quote]

congrats those are great pictures!

[quote="Nadine"]I could post more scans, but I don't want to ruin janetka's great success, so I'll leave it at that! Hope this helps though!

@lizard. Thanks for your kind answer. I believe the signatures are real. I have got an answer from Bradley, too. Also from the A-Team Set and
I think its ok :-) {up}

Here is my picture:

http://img682.imageshack.us/i/bradle.jpg/[/quote]
Of course, no problem Nadine! :) If my success is waiting for me at home (keeping my fingers crossed), I'll post scans in my topic to compare to! {up} I love the photo you sent, it's great!!

Enjoy & best to you!

I could post more scans, but I don't want to ruin janetka's great success, so I'll leave it at that! Hope this helps though!

@lizard. Thanks for your kind answer. I believe the signatures are real. I have got an answer from Bradley, too. Also from the A-Team Set and
I think its ok :-) {up}

Here is my picture:

http://img682.imageshack.us/i/bradle.jpg/

Very nice, congrats!

Congrats very nice success

[quote="Nadine"]Hi,
do you think the signature is real from Bradley?
Some people discuss in another forum that the A-Team signatures are fake....[/quote]
Hi Nadine! ;)

I know some people doubt the authenticity, but honestly, I am very convinced [b]all his replies are authentic signed by Bradley[/b]. I've been gathering scans and comparing it for weeks now, and there is an obvious resemblance between the VV ones and in person autographs. {up} Also, how come the Broadway successes back in 2006 match perfectly to recent feedback? It's a well-known fact that Broadway doesn't send out sec's during the course of the play (and the feedback was received during production, not after and neither was it forwarded to another city). Just search the "Via Venue Feedback" forum to see those successes! :)

I could post more scans, but I don't want to ruin janetka's great success, so I'll leave it at that! Hope this helps though! :D

Hi,
do you think the signature is real from Bradley?
Some people discuss in another forum that the A-Team signatures are fake....