by purd90 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:40 am
Hi everyone...so, my parents told me that I received a photo back signed from Victor Garber. I sent to him while he was in
Present Laughter (now closed) back in January, and today I received my photo back unsigned and one of his signed. The thing is, I'm not sure if it's an autopenned photo. Father inspected the photo and said that the sig is definitely not part of the photo (I'm ruling out a pre-print), but if it is an autopen, why wouldn't his agency just autopen my photo? I'm remaining optimistic that this is a pre-signed photo until I can see it for myself this Thursday, but here's an up-close picture of the signature. PLEASE let me know what you think.
Date sent: mid-late January
Received: today
Address used:
Present Laughter (no longer valid)
Here's the pic:

Hi everyone...so, my parents told me that I received a photo back signed from Victor Garber. I sent to him while he was in [i]Present Laughter[/i] (now closed) back in January, and today I received my photo back unsigned and one of his signed. The thing is, I'm not sure if it's an autopenned photo. Father inspected the photo and said that the sig is definitely not part of the photo (I'm ruling out a pre-print), but if it is an autopen, why wouldn't his agency just autopen my photo? I'm remaining optimistic that this is a pre-signed photo until I can see it for myself this Thursday, but here's an up-close picture of the signature. PLEASE let me know what you think. :mrgreen:
Date sent: mid-late January
Received: today
Address used: [i]Present Laughter[/i] (no longer valid)
Here's the pic:
[img]http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n70/purd90/25705_119487308063299_1000000609120.jpg[/img]