by Greed » Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:49 pm
YorkshirePaul wrote:On 20th April 2011, i sent 3 photos to Hugh c/o a theatre in San Francisco he was appearing in (no longer valid) - I had forgotten about this until today when my photos arrived back. Only one photo was ''signed'' which i now strongly think is autopenned - am i right??? though if they autopen, why not autopen them all??!!! anyway, this is the envelope and signed photo
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/824/dscf5929h.jpg/
Yep, definitely an autopen. He's infamous for the "Thanks!" in autopens. Kind of sucks, as he'd be a really good one to get. I tried sending to him about a year and a half ago and didn't receive anything back. Sorry for your autopen.

[quote="YorkshirePaul"]On 20th April 2011, i sent 3 photos to Hugh c/o a theatre in San Francisco he was appearing in (no longer valid) - I had forgotten about this until today when my photos arrived back. Only one photo was ''signed'' which i now strongly think is autopenned - am i right??? though if they autopen, why not autopen them all??!!! anyway, this is the envelope and signed photo
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/824/dscf5929h.jpg/[/quote]
Yep, definitely an autopen. He's infamous for the "Thanks!" in autopens. Kind of sucks, as he'd be a really good one to get. I tried sending to him about a year and a half ago and didn't receive anything back. Sorry for your autopen. :(