Crushphoto wrote:This is the ONLY instance of an In Person that would make me say maybe



The other in persons all look like this


And the VV from earlier this year at the OZ address looks like this

buffysatine wrote:

twiguy666 wrote:wow, could you be anymore arrogant? I didn't realise we were in the company of such handwriting expert royalty. as you said, no one cares. you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and claim you did some course. big deal. these are just autos. not some documents you think are the same. these are not authentic. It isn't rocket science and it does not take much to realise it.
and sorry but who is the one who is demanding they are correct because they are the most awesome handwriting expert of all time?? your last post could not have been more self-centered. maybe you should take another course because you obviously didn't pass this one.

Thanks but I'll take my advice from someone who has been collecting longer since 2009. So nice of you to be so friendly & polite on a forum you joined a few days ago. Why would anyone take YOU seriously? This forum gets down right laughable, great to know you are the worlds biggest autority on Mr Franco & his handwriting. I suggest you take over the comments on all threads about him in future.

I love the way you kids treat anyone with knowledge & expereince as arrogant etc..... Your generation won't even consider looking at someone else expereince etc.... Its quite sad. Get nasty & take cheap shots like royalty etc... I dont give a hoot. At the end of the day I know what I'm talking about & have the collection & info to prove it. Hardly comment anymore as the users here are so rude & arrogant little know it alls & the priceless thing is most have been collecting a year or two at that. I only posted on this one as I know the OP.

Post away but I wont be wasting my time responsing to you - I have a life. And studying handwriting/signatures is not the same as autographs PLEASE??!!!

twiguy666 wrote:wow, could you be anymore arrogant? I didn't realise we were in the company of such handwriting expert royalty. as you said, no one cares. you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and claim you did some course. big deal. these are just autos. not some documents you think are the same. these are not authentic. It isn't rocket science and it does not take much to realise it.
and sorry but who is the one who is demanding they are correct because they are the most awesome handwriting expert of all time?? your last post could not have been more self-centered. maybe you should take another course because you obviously didn't pass this one.

twiguy666 wrote:

buffysatine wrote:

Crushphoto wrote:If one out of the three were like that then maybe. But they are all disjointed and his signature has been like the previous TTM's for years now...

IE
Official cards and the F doesn't look anything like this TTM

Signing a few of these official cards several years ago is a bit different to sitting down to a pile of fanmail & signing. For started he has a dreadful signature to begin with. Second I have seen In person autos signed EXACTLY like the Via venue successes coming from OZ & other movie sets he signs from. You can't base its not real on one fan card. Like many other autos I have done a lot of research on Jame's and have several years of examples of in person - TTM - Via Venue.

everyone can stop worrying now, we have the ultimate expert here to tell us that these are real lol. get over yourself, you have no idea. these are not authentic and comparing VV to IP is just stupid. the fan card was for comparison. there is no similarities to the card and these at all. hence why they put up the picture of the card. how much research could you have possible done? clearly not enough. Google image Franco's autograph and none of them look like these. Maybe because they aren't real!