by georgethree33 » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:13 pm
See this is why I'm asking. Because he's never signed TTM before as far as I know. But I've also never seen him use a secretarial signature either? Otherwise we'd be seeing a lot more sec sigs all over. If he did sign it, given that it clearly came from overseas, that yeah - I'd assume that he wouldn't have signed in a hurry, so thus why the sig isn't as sloppy as some of the IPs I've seen. I'm guessing the tour manager read the letter, held onto the request and approached him at a quieter time on my behalf. Whoever signed it, has access to their press photos and appears to know the signature. Looks legit as you said, but there are differences in how he typically signs now, versus a couple years ago. Thus - why I asked for feedback.
I appreciate the feedback! Thanks! As it is right now - I'm guessing it's legit. I'd certainly like to think so, but I'm fairly realistic.
See this is why I'm asking. Because he's never signed TTM before as far as I know. But I've also never seen him use a secretarial signature either? Otherwise we'd be seeing a lot more sec sigs all over. If he did sign it, given that it clearly came from overseas, that yeah - I'd assume that he wouldn't have signed in a hurry, so thus why the sig isn't as sloppy as some of the IPs I've seen. I'm guessing the tour manager read the letter, held onto the request and approached him at a quieter time on my behalf. Whoever signed it, has access to their press photos and appears to know the signature. Looks legit as you said, but there are differences in how he typically signs now, versus a couple years ago. Thus - why I asked for feedback.
I appreciate the feedback! Thanks! As it is right now - I'm guessing it's legit. I'd certainly like to think so, but I'm fairly realistic.