Petejackson wrote:

Greg2600 wrote:

michaelwsnyder wrote:I tried to pick something other than Die Hard, and Sixth Sense. In hopes it might catch his, or his assistants eye. I would send something just in case.

Given that people have sent Misery items, and gotten clear secs, I doubt that matters. If by chance Bruce hit yours, the odds are that he was signing either for another reason (charity?), or was in a rare good mood. Rather than sit on 15 boxes of mail, the assistants may just give him a box or two at that time. All others are done by them, and returned, hence the short turnaround time on all of these VV. These are just assumptions on my part. Again, Bruce is not Hellen Mirren, who signed everything sent VV last year. He's simply NOT a friendly guy with fans, and seems to enjoy being this way. IDK, maybe it furthers his persona?

He's not a friendly guy no. He doesn't really give a jot.

Greg2600 wrote:

michaelwsnyder wrote:I tried to pick something other than Die Hard, and Sixth Sense. In hopes it might catch his, or his assistants eye. I would send something just in case.

Given that people have sent Misery items, and gotten clear secs, I doubt that matters. If by chance Bruce hit yours, the odds are that he was signing either for another reason (charity?), or was in a rare good mood. Rather than sit on 15 boxes of mail, the assistants may just give him a box or two at that time. All others are done by them, and returned, hence the short turnaround time on all of these VV. These are just assumptions on my part. Again, Bruce is not Hellen Mirren, who signed everything sent VV last year. He's simply NOT a friendly guy with fans, and seems to enjoy being this way. IDK, maybe it furthers his persona?

Greg2600 wrote:My original take on Michael's DVD's were that they were the closest anyone had received to Bruce's actual/recent signature style. Maybe one other person (http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 5&t=395394) received one in the same style as his. All the others were clearly sec.

I remain very skeptical these are truly Bruce's, because circumstantially why would he sign some and not others? And he's a terrible signer, as many have stated before. I also still don't like the B's in the signatures. His graph can fluctuate quite a bit. Unfortunately AT BEST we have a hung jury on these. I can't totally deny them, but I can't say to myself (if I got them) yes these are good. Beyond the two users I have cited, all other VV's are secs. Maybe I'll risk a crappy DVD for a send in, or an 8x10. Not risking anything I actually like to be defaced by the sec though.

Petejackson wrote:Subject: Bruce Willis - Via Venue - Comments on authenticity welcomed

michaelwsnyder wrote:

Sent a LOR, SASE, and 2 DVD Slipcovers on 12/10/15.
Received my items (non personalized) on 12/22/15.

Comments on authenticity are welcomed!
Used the address for Misery in NY.

You silly fat American
You been eating that many donuts and macdonald burgers they have effected your Brain
Of course they are secs.

Greg2600 wrote:The W is even worse. On the authenticated, the W flows directly into the rest of Willis. On both of yours, there's a break between the W and illis. Huge red flags, IMO proving both are secs. I strongly feel everything VV from him is sec, he just doesn't want to be bothered.

michaelwsnyder wrote:

Towie96 wrote:michaelwsnyder I think you must be a bit desperate if you think bruce Willis is signing peoples photos and posting them back to them through the mail...he gets thousands And thousands of fanmail letters every week from around the world. He has been getting these letters for over 30 years. If you think he's going to start signing ttm now then you have got a screw loose.
LOL!!! It's pretty obvious looking at the evidence that he has a sec. If you want to kid yourself that they are real then that's fine but with you keep banging on Trying to prove it, you are making yourself into a jerk. Now stop being so silly grow up and stop talking such nonsense.

Towie, I'm done trying to prove it. I apologize for giving actual photo proof, with analysis. I understand, the proper way to refute evidence is by telling someone they are a jerk (No, that makes you look childish). Of course offering no analysis to countering my claims, and just saying it's clearly a sec is far superior. Forum warriors, not interested in giving anything other than opinion. "It's fake, because I say so."

Good day sir.

Towie96 wrote:michaelwsnyder I think you must be a bit desperate if you think bruce Willis is signing peoples photos and posting them back to them through the mail...he gets thousands And thousands of fanmail letters every week from around the world. He has been getting these letters for over 30 years. If you think he's going to start signing ttm now then you have got a screw loose.
LOL!!! It's pretty obvious looking at the evidence that he has a sec. If you want to kid yourself that they are real then that's fine but with you keep banging on Trying to prove it, you are making yourself into a jerk. Now stop being so silly grow up and stop talking such nonsense.

Towie96 wrote:michaelwsnyder I think you must be a bit desperate if you think bruce Willis is signing peoples photos and posting them back to them through the mail...he gets thousands And thousands of fanmail letters every week from around the world. He has been getting these letters for over 30 years. If you think he's going to start signing ttm now then you have got a screw loose.
LOL!!! It's pretty obvious looking at the evidence that he has a sec. If you want to kid yourself that they are real then that's fine but with you keep banging on Trying to prove it, you are making yourself into a jerk. Now stop being so silly grow up and stop talking such nonsense.