PATRICK DEMPSEY AUTHENTIC SUCCESS!!

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: PATRICK DEMPSEY AUTHENTIC SUCCESS!!

by chelseac92 » Tue May 22, 2007 5:29 pm

also, does anyone have any in person or authentic ttm autographs of his? I've only seen his preprints, so maybe if i were to see another one of his signatures, perhaps it'd look more similar to the one i got or more different or something.

also, again, if anyone wants to add their opinions, please go right ahead :)

by chelseac92 » Mon May 21, 2007 1:23 am

Thank you everyone for all of your feedback :)

im still not sure, and I loved getting all of your opinions :) If anyone has anymore, I would love it.

i thought the same thing mailman-i didnt understand why he'd have a secretery sign it if hes with SFM, it wouldnt make sense. but then again they do look quite different.

i think hed just send me a PP though if he didnt have time to sign it, you'd think.

hmmm...very confusing. maybe he signed quickly? who knows. I wish someone was psychic or i wish i could call up patrick dempsey and ask hahah

again, any other input is appreciated. THANKS EVERYONE! :D

by TheMailman » Sun May 20, 2007 10:21 pm

I think they're possibly authentic.

Image

Although it is rather different, they do resemble each other. Look at the way the P and D start.

Or it could be a poorly attempt at copying Patrick's autograph.

But why would Patrick have a secretary sign them if he is with SFM?

TheMailman 8)

by Chris102 » Sun May 20, 2007 10:18 pm

Great success, chelseac92! :mrgreen: {up}

by Dallas » Sun May 20, 2007 8:54 pm

I have reasons as to why they could be secretarial and authentic, but I'm leaning towards secretarial.

The signatures look a little "drawn" to me like a secretary was copying it from a real signature, since you can see pen breaks.

It might be authentic if he was walking and someone brought them up to him because his hand might have tilted or it could be rushed.

Since my authentic reason is probably unlikely I am gonna stick with secs.

Too bad, but now I won't waste my high quality pictures on a sec sig.

by chelseac92 » Sun May 20, 2007 7:14 pm

FINALLY HERE IT IS:

Image

AND

Image

i sent him the pics and he signed them

can you please give me ur input!

what do you think? secreterial or authentic? please, it means a lot to me !

:)thanks

by chelseac92 » Sun May 20, 2007 6:51 pm

nevermind, im going to take a pic of it and then it will be a jpeg. ill upload it asap

by chelseac92 » Sun May 20, 2007 6:41 pm

I scanned it, and its opening as a PDF file. To turn it into an HTML tag, it needs to be a jpeg when using photobucket.

This means I don't know how to put it on here since I can't get the html tag since it wont upload since when I scan it, its a pdf file. Ive tried everything, and after i try to change it to a jpeg file, its uploading as a pdf.

I'm reaally sorry :( And im mad because I wanted your opinions on if it was secreterial or not


the only thing i can think of is if you guys wanted to pm me your email addresses, I could attach the PDF file in an email to you guys.

So for everyone who wants to give me input and see the pic, please PM me ur emails, or post ur emails.

thanks!

:)

by loveryan » Sun May 20, 2007 8:13 am

Hi!!
Great success!
Can you put a scan of pic?
Thanks :)

by TheMailman » Sat May 19, 2007 8:53 pm

^ Since when did you watch Grey's, Aimee? :wink:

TheMailman :lol:

Top