by whytestarline » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:04 am
Hey Everyone,
Sorry if this has been addressed before, but I was unable to locate a previous topic regarding the authenticity of Iconographs using the search function.
My question is if you feel their company is 100% legitimate. I know an autograph can slip through the cracks every now and then, even with the most reputable seller, but as a whole what do you think of them?
I have purchased from Iconographs a lot in the past, and still do on occasion, but I've noticed several of their autographs differ from those I've seen elsewhere. For example, if I compare the same signature for a given celebrity; one from Autograph World, and one from Iconographs, they often vary. The strange thing is the autographs are consistent between sellers.
The signatures from Iconographs often appear shorter or rushed in my opinion compared to others I've seen. I know autographs can vary depending on whether or not the person was sitting, standing, etc, but why would this be consistent with them?
I've also noticed they no longer provide the details of when and where the autograph was obtained unless you specifically ask for it. This information used to be accompanied with every photo in the past.
Everything may be fine, but I figure it's time to ask before I continue to make additional purchases from them.
Any information and input is appreciated.
Hey Everyone,
Sorry if this has been addressed before, but I was unable to locate a previous topic regarding the authenticity of Iconographs using the search function.
My question is if you feel their company is 100% legitimate. I know an autograph can slip through the cracks every now and then, even with the most reputable seller, but as a whole what do you think of them?
I have purchased from Iconographs a lot in the past, and still do on occasion, but I've noticed several of their autographs differ from those I've seen elsewhere. For example, if I compare the same signature for a given celebrity; one from Autograph World, and one from Iconographs, they often vary. The strange thing is the autographs are consistent between sellers.
The signatures from Iconographs often appear shorter or rushed in my opinion compared to others I've seen. I know autographs can vary depending on whether or not the person was sitting, standing, etc, but why would this be consistent with them?
I've also noticed they no longer provide the details of when and where the autograph was obtained unless you specifically ask for it. This information used to be accompanied with every photo in the past.
Everything may be fine, but I figure it's time to ask before I continue to make additional purchases from them.
Any information and input is appreciated.
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur