by osiris » Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:19 am
In this case, as the post office is not the only place that postage is checked, they'd assume you didnt put enough on and would ask the recipient to pay for it. If they refuse, you'd get an RTS.
Never mind the fact that it's incredibly immature, and you're "punishing" perhaps one or two employees in a way that doesnt even work (it's not like you not paying enough postage will affect them).
Jaffer wrote:No it's not true in the slightest

It would be classified as a misdemeanour at very, very worst. Most likely they would simply not deliver it. No crime, no punishment. Just a simple RTS
Trying to get postage without paying for it is still a crime. It's fraud. Whether they bother to punish you (and if you get caught) for it is another matter.
In this case, as the post office is not the only place that postage is checked, they'd assume you didnt put enough on and would ask the recipient to pay for it. If they refuse, you'd get an RTS.
Never mind the fact that it's incredibly immature, and you're "punishing" perhaps one or two employees in a way that doesnt even work (it's not like you not paying enough postage will affect them).
[quote="Jaffer"]No it's not true in the slightest :roll: It would be classified as a misdemeanour at very, very worst. Most likely they would simply not deliver it. No crime, no punishment. Just a simple RTS[/quote]
Trying to get postage without paying for it is still a crime. It's fraud. Whether they bother to punish you (and if you get caught) for it is another matter.