by HappinessStan » Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:33 am
johnnylightninglives wrote:I totally disagree...the photos i print at home are much nicer than ones you get at stores.I use a canon printer with canon ink and high quality photo paper and the junk you get at stores does not compare to the quality i get on my printer...You must be using poor quality paper or something.
I'm very happy with the quality of the ones I get printed professionally in the UK, and at 25p (just under 40 US cents) each for a 7"x5" or 8"x6", and as many free 4"x6" ones as I can possibly use through introductory offers, it would be a very long time before a printer paid for itself in my case, once ink and quality photo paper was priced in as well. I'm fairly certain that the cost of the high quality paper on its own would cost more than the ones I get printed.
I'm not saying don't do it, but if you're on a budget it's a good idea to consider the economics of it, and do the research on the right printer, paper and ink for the job.
[quote="johnnylightninglives"]I totally disagree...the photos i print at home are much nicer than ones you get at stores.I use a canon printer with canon ink and high quality photo paper and the junk you get at stores does not compare to the quality i get on my printer...You must be using poor quality paper or something.[/quote]
I'm very happy with the quality of the ones I get printed professionally in the UK, and at 25p (just under 40 US cents) each for a 7"x5" or 8"x6", and as many free 4"x6" ones as I can possibly use through introductory offers, it would be a very long time before a printer paid for itself in my case, once ink and quality photo paper was priced in as well. I'm fairly certain that the cost of the high quality paper on its own would cost more than the ones I get printed.
I'm not saying don't do it, but if you're on a budget it's a good idea to consider the economics of it, and do the research on the right printer, paper and ink for the job.