Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to include?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to include?

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by Twelveby12 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 7:19 pm

PJ11390 wrote:
Uncle Sam wrote:I think photo paper looks better when displayed, but you can print on any paper.
Ok. I just wanted to double check. I didn't want to send a computer paper printed photo to a celeb and then not get the autograph because it wasn't printed on nicer photo paper. I'm going to google images to find my photo.
Hey, yeah, they'll sign pretty much anything you send, if they're going to sign. Do check out online photo printers like aldiphotos.co.uk though, they're dirt cheap and print to a high quality.

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by PJ11390 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:38 pm

Uncle Sam wrote:I think photo paper looks better when displayed, but you can print on any paper.
Ok. I just wanted to double check. I didn't want to send a computer paper printed photo to a celeb and then not get the autograph because it wasn't printed on nicer photo paper. I'm going to google images to find my photo.

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by username_removed » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:42 pm

The sheer bliss of knowing nobody gives a stuff about whether or not I'm on your ignore list. Personally, I couldn't care less, I find it hilarious that you felt the need to block me because you know I was right lmfao! Idiot.

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by Twelveby12 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:38 pm

"This post was made by frankeedaley who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post."

The sheer bliss of knowing you can block morons :D

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by username_removed » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:31 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:If you're going to ask for help, don't go abusing other members. The topic was offtopic anyway, and was going to be moved. It has been. If we want to engage in some banter, we'll do that, regardless of your opinion. It's nothing to do with one rule for one, one for another, it's called humour and trying to lighten things up a bit. If you don't like it, take your own advice. Oh, and you may not see the point of writing to a puppet, but then someone else might not see the point in running around to meet "Celeb" wannabes like the big brother contestants. I didn't see anyone slating that.

Now off you go, and try and get a sense of humour in the meantime, it will do you good in later life.

Edit to add

"Information
Your foes list has been updated successfully.
Return to the User Control Panel"

The best possible phrase on FM
What a load of bull! You know full well that if someone else was "bantering" off topic like this, you'd have stuck your oar in and told them to take it elsewhere.

I'm not asking for help either, if you must know - I said advice is welcome, there's a difference. Where am I actually asking for help? exactly.

wannabe big brother contestants? they were famous before big brother so that fails... :lol:

I've had enough of you already, I'm going to take my own advice now and not answer you.


OP, apologies for the fighting, but I had to stand up for the hundreds of users on here that have been told to move their conversation elsewhere by these two moron mods, when they feel they can do the same and get away with it - I think power has gone to their head.

goodbye.

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by Twelveby12 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:21 pm

If you're going to ask for help, don't go abusing other members. The topic was offtopic anyway, and was going to be moved. It has been. If we want to engage in some banter, we'll do that, regardless of your opinion. It's nothing to do with one rule for one, one for another, it's called humour and trying to lighten things up a bit. If you don't like it, take your own advice. Oh, and you may not see the point of writing to a puppet, but then someone else might not see the point in running around to meet "Celeb" wannabes like the big brother contestants. I didn't see anyone slating that.

Now off you go, and try and get a sense of humour in the meantime, it will do you good in later life.

Edit to add

"Information
Your foes list has been updated successfully.
Return to the User Control Panel"

The best possible phrase on FM

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by username_removed » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:08 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:
frankeedaley wrote:I'm sure I've just seen a reply from Twelveby12 on another topic saying that it isn't listed in the correct forum...

maybe this entire (pointless, by the way) conversation with James should be in the GENERAL DISCUSSION section?

Practice what you preach, people!
It's called banter mate, but given your other posts since joining, I doubt you'd get that. This whole post has been moved to collecting hope, as we knew it would be, as it was posted in the wrong place. But yeah, given your signature asks for help from people, maybe you'd like to post without hurling cr@p around at people? James and I are both long term members and current/past mods of the forum, and put a LOT more into it than you do. Just a small point...
Well considering you are mods of this forum, you should be more cooperative with the rules that you impose on other members. I may be new to actually owning an account here, but ive been coming on here for years and I've seen you and James tell new members to stay on topic before, yet it's perfectly fine when you two do so... one rule for one, one for another. Since you're mods, you should be setting examples, not spamming the life out of a (rather ridiculous) topic with your Faulty Towers nonsense and the telling other people off for doing the same!

also, I'm not hurling cr@p around at people for your information... I just fail to see the point in asking for a puppets autograph! if you don't like my honesty, dont read my posts, simple as :) and so what my signature asks for TTM help? I've been an IP collector for 8 years, I've never sent TTM! what that has to do with you and James going so far off topic here is beyond me...

next excuse?

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by Twelveby12 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:01 pm

James wrote:To the OP, apologies for the Fawlty Towers fun. :mrgreen:

Yes, sorry OP, it's these Moderators you see, you just can't get the staff any more. We had to fly him over from Barcelona!

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by Twelveby12 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:59 pm

frankeedaley wrote:I'm sure I've just seen a reply from Twelveby12 on another topic saying that it isn't listed in the correct forum...

maybe this entire (pointless, by the way) conversation with James should be in the GENERAL DISCUSSION section?

Practice what you preach, people!
It's called banter mate, but given your other posts since joining, I doubt you'd get that. This whole post has been moved to collecting hope, as we knew it would be, as it was posted in the wrong place. But yeah, given your signature asks for help from people, maybe you'd like to post without hurling cr@p around at people? James and I are both long term members and current/past mods of the forum, and put a LOT more into it than you do. Just a small point...

Re: Is there a certain kind of photo were supposed to includ

by username_removed » Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:48 pm

I'm sure I've just seen a reply from Twelveby12 on another topic saying that it isn't listed in the correct forum...

maybe this entire (pointless, by the way) conversation with James should be in the GENERAL DISCUSSION section?

Practice what you preach, people!

Top