Uhhh

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Uhhh

Re: Uhhh

by Normanbotts » Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:24 pm

dancingirl1 wrote:First off don't even try to say you "never" used acronyms on twitter or FB or anywhere. And I like gifs. You don't have to like what I like...That's the best thing in this little place called America. [us] LOVE THE FREEDOM! : ) I dont care. And u can block me. {up} Have a great night.
Yes your correct. And if you want chocolate donuts for breakfast and mcdonald cheeseburgers and double fries for lunch and 2 or 3 banana split milkshakes for supper then it has nothing too do with anybody. I agree. God bless america :mrgreen: [us] {up} {??}. Oh and I nearly forgot, Have a nice day now!!!

Re: Uhhh

by JessicaR49 » Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:42 am

dancingirl1 wrote:First off don't even try to say you "never" used acronyms on twitter or FB or anywhere. And I like gifs. You don't have to like what I like...That's the best thing in this little place called America. [us] LOVE THE FREEDOM! : ) I dont care. And u can block me. {up} Have a great night.
{up} {up}

Re: Uhhh

by dancingirl1 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:18 pm

First off don't even try to say you "never" used acronyms on twitter or FB or anywhere. And I like gifs. You don't have to like what I like...That's the best thing in this little place called America. [us] LOVE THE FREEDOM! : ) I dont care. And u can block me. {up} Have a great night.

Re: Uhhh

by stillluckyas13canbe » Wed Mar 05, 2014 8:50 am

Is there a serious reason why you are incapable of using the English language correctly?

One day, and I mean one day, you will grow up and realise that you can't spend your life communicating with babyish acronyms and pictures of people pouting and/or blowing kisses.

In the meantime, sadly, as you do have some valid points, you are now on my block list too. Not that I expect you to care, but it does mean that I have another step towards using FM as it should be, without the idiots, trolls and drama queens.

Re: Uhhh

by dancingirl1 » Tue Mar 04, 2014 11:36 pm

SMH lol

Re: Uhhh

by JessicaR49 » Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:42 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
JessicaR49 wrote:So I'm immature because i stated what I think a fight contains? Oh yes. And no one here cares about the judge Judy ****. So stop trying to bring it up. My god. Also for like the THIRD TIME, i stated its not that they are to small to not write to. It's just THERE IS NO WAY to. Do you even read the responses before commenting back?
No, you're immature because you're incapable of responding without engaging your brain first. The Judge Judy quote was the only part of my original response which could be considered aggravating, hence mentioning it. I acknowledge I misread your first point about them being too small to have contact details (though I don't believe that to be true), and I addressed it in the very post you just responded to in a little tizz. So, to quote yourself "Do you even read the responses before commenting back?".

Once again, ONE person responding with some actual advice, ME! You either realised that you'd made an post which made no sense and are trying to cover your back with arrogance or you actually are this stupid. Either way, in terms of fanmail and celebrity requests I do have several things you don't - experience in terms of maturity and years of collecting and the knowledge I have had more than 10000 autographs pass through my hands in the last five years alone. That's what puts me, and several others on this forum, in the prime position to make comments about this sort of post.

While I do agree with the posts of MW1221 and that they are taking the right route in educating posters, I have to wonder why you chose to be a fool and have a go at the person trying to help you rather than the one mocking you outright?

The last post I made suggested a way where you might be able to get some advice from people on this forum, and I see there is a list of the names you're looking for. You might want to outline how you have tried to find contact details, where you have looked etc, so that some advice could be offered. You never know what people out there know. Posting like this does nothing but enhance the perception of immaturity. If you stop trying to create a fight, and actually look through the posts, you might just *somehow* be able to look at it differently. If you're just going to continue posting the same ill-informed dross, then I'll cheerfully add you to my block list and hope you (unlike several other posters) realise that means I enjoy a blissful silence from anything you post.
Go ahead block me (:

Re: Uhhh

by stillluckyas13canbe » Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:24 pm

JessicaR49 wrote:So I'm immature because i stated what I think a fight contains? Oh yes. And no one here cares about the judge Judy ****. So stop trying to bring it up. My god. Also for like the THIRD TIME, i stated its not that they are to small to not write to. It's just THERE IS NO WAY to. Do you even read the responses before commenting back?
No, you're immature because you're incapable of responding without engaging your brain first. The Judge Judy quote was the only part of my original response which could be considered aggravating, hence mentioning it. I acknowledge I misread your first point about them being too small to have contact details (though I don't believe that to be true), and I addressed it in the very post you just responded to in a little tizz. So, to quote yourself "Do you even read the responses before commenting back?".

Once again, ONE person responding with some actual advice, ME! You either realised that you'd made an post which made no sense and are trying to cover your back with arrogance or you actually are this stupid. Either way, in terms of fanmail and celebrity requests I do have several things you don't - experience in terms of maturity and years of collecting and the knowledge I have had more than 10000 autographs pass through my hands in the last five years alone. That's what puts me, and several others on this forum, in the prime position to make comments about this sort of post.

While I do agree with the posts of MW1221 and that they are taking the right route in educating posters, I have to wonder why you chose to be a fool and have a go at the person trying to help you rather than the one mocking you outright?

The last post I made suggested a way where you might be able to get some advice from people on this forum, and I see there is a list of the names you're looking for. You might want to outline how you have tried to find contact details, where you have looked etc, so that some advice could be offered. You never know what people out there know. Posting like this does nothing but enhance the perception of immaturity. If you stop trying to create a fight, and actually look through the posts, you might just *somehow* be able to look at it differently. If you're just going to continue posting the same ill-informed dross, then I'll cheerfully add you to my block list and hope you (unlike several other posters) realise that means I enjoy a blissful silence from anything you post.

Re: Uhhh

by JessicaR49 » Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:04 pm

So I'm immature because i stated what I think a fight contains? Oh yes. And no one here cares about the judge Judy shit. So stop trying to bring it up. My god. Also for like the THIRD TIME, i stated its not that they are to small to not write to. It's just THERE IS NO WAY to. Do you even read the responses before commenting back?

Re: Uhhh

by stillluckyas13canbe » Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:21 pm

JessicaR49 wrote:
stillluckyas13canbe wrote:There was no fight, there was nothing but reasoned responses. I would love to know what you think constitutes a "fight" there.

I asked what the OP wanted help with, they failed to reply to that. I fail to see how this could be simpler.
Back talk, smart ass responses, ass hole comments
Now you're just showing immaturity. If you can't handle the humour of the Judge Judy comment that's your call, but the rest is 100% on the money. You asked for help without actually asking anything, you put a topic title which had no relevance to anything. I answered with the only two possible answers... you either give up collecting because there is nothing else for you, or you consider that no one is too small to write to and there may well be a way to do so.

Perhaps it's worth noting only one person actually took the time to give you a response with some common sense in it.

Then again I am not the one resorting to using bad language there, but of course I'm not the kid here. The same reason is why I don't view this as a "fight".

When you've figured out what you actually want from this thread... is it thoughts on people from shows you actually like but haven't thought of, finding a way to get in touch with people who you think might not be reachable, or whatever, come back with it... maybe someone will have an answer or at least some way of helping. Until then, you might want to consider how deep that hole you're digging is getting...it's pretty difficult to dig up when you get that far down.

Re: Uhhh

by JessicaR49 » Tue Mar 04, 2014 1:16 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:There was no fight, there was nothing but reasoned responses. I would love to know what you think constitutes a "fight" there.

I asked what the OP wanted help with, they failed to reply to that. I fail to see how this could be simpler.
Back talk, smart ass responses, ass hole comments

Top