by Shambler » Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:45 am
Ejm1059 wrote:There was one, but it ended up being fake
That was actually a fake via venue ''success'', not one pertaining to the 19 address. I've only seen one response from the 19 address, and it was an unsigned/horribly bent photo of her, that had looked as if it went through a washing machine. I personally wouldn't waste my time with sending to her.

[quote="Ejm1059"]There was one, but it ended up being fake :?
[/quote]
That was actually a fake via venue ''success'', not one pertaining to the 19 address. I've only seen one response from the 19 address, and it was an unsigned/horribly bent photo of her, that had looked as if it went through a washing machine. I personally wouldn't waste my time with sending to her. {up}