is it reallie okay

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: is it reallie okay

by dark_raider » Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:50 am

I did it s few years back. I used to take the stamps off other envelopes because I couldnt find any stamps. I dont have a problem with it and it always works and I never have like " Return to sender"

by starreyes » Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:50 am

[quote="Lucas42"] They probably can't tell, so I guess if you have no probs with being a crim then it's fine. Although they might guess if the stamp is cut out and stuck on instead of stuck on directly. They probably wouldn't care about the money, but why bother to deliver your mail when they don't have to? [/quote]

Actualy there is a way you can cut out the stamp and then place it print side down in warm water for awhile and then peel it off and glue it on. The ink doesn't come off or anything, I [i] think [/i], but I haven't done that in awhile. It does work though.

I agree with idiotic idiot06, it can really add up after awhile.


Random Coment Because I quoted: I think I'm finaly getting the hang of doing quotes!

by idiotic idiot06 » Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:57 pm

rpbluesman wrote: And besides, why would they make an issue about a measly thirty-seven cents.
Haha, it's not so measly when you have to pay for two on the envelope and two on the sase, wasting four for each ceebrity. If you sent a sase to every celeberity, and you sent it to 30 celebs, you would be wasting $44.40. Which is another good reason to re-use them if they're not stamped!

by sex_is_not_the_enemy » Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:43 pm

I thought we've all covered this topic :|

by rpbluesman » Tue Dec 27, 2005 7:28 pm

This goes back to what I was saying. How would they know? And, why would they make a big deal about thirty-nine cents.

by rpbluesman » Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:57 pm

sex_is_not_the_enemy wrote:Not a huge problem, but a huge discussion! :mrgreen:
Quite true. :D

by sex_is_not_the_enemy » Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:42 pm

Not a huge problem, but a huge discussion! :mrgreen:

by TaeBee16 » Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:38 pm

i didnt mean to cause i huge problem. I was just wondering if it works. :) Whoever doesnt feel right doing it, just dont. And if you do, then have fun!! And good luck!! :)

Merry Christmas to all!

by rpbluesman » Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:45 pm

YOURS_SINCERELY wrote:It baffles me why some people think its so wrong to re-use an unmarked stamp!!! If anything it would be a crime to let an un-cancelled stamp go to waste (what with all the emphasis on recycling), if the postal service doesn't cancel your stamp that is their fault... your quite within your rights to use it on another envelope!
Exactly. [agree]

by YOURS_SINCERELY » Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:15 am

It baffles me why some people think its so wrong to re-use an unmarked stamp!!! If anything it would be a crime to let an un-cancelled stamp go to waste (what with all the emphasis on recycling), if the postal service doesn't cancel your stamp that is their fault... your quite within your rights to use it on another envelope!

There was a thread a couple of weeks ago regarding this issue, it seems that the general consensus is that it is okay to re-use stamps which the postal service havent cancelled!

To quote 'sex_is_not_the_enemy'
"if you feel uncomfortable with it, just don't do it"

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL... {up}

YOURS_SINCERELY

Top