Matte or Glossy pictures ?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail] (new) [comet] [santa] [xmast-tree]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Matte or Glossy pictures ?

Re: Matte or Glossy pictures ?

by packrat » Thu Dec 30, 2010 8:08 pm

I've had both signed and so far they have all held up okay. I personally like the matte style better. I've found from experience that the glossy photos can sometimes get finger print marks that are difficult to get rid of, a problem I haven't had with the matte photos.

Re: Matte or Glossy pictures ?

by Big Ben » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:58 pm

I actually don't know which ones are best, but I always use glossy ones as I think they look better ;) .

Matte or Glossy pictures ?

by ScottishDan » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:37 pm

I noticed today when I ordered some prints online I could have rather Matte pictures or Glossy pictures. I wasn't too sure which one to pick so I picked Glossy. Which is best for autographs? Thanks :D

Top