by Jaffer » Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:57 am
Hahaha it's clear which part of the political spectrum the penultimate user is on. I would have no issue with privatisation IF the law was kept in place stipulating that the price of postage can raise no higher then inflation. The problem I have with privatisation is that if the company goes bust, it will be the end of mail as we know it. There won't be other revenue to pump into it. Additionally, who would want to buy it? Sure, there are private delivery companies, but they seem to deliver parcels/packages (correct me if I am wrong). It is unfair to blame the government, as email would have wreaked havoc, public or private. Personally, here in Australia, I don't find private sector service any better than government workers (in saying that, our service is known to suck hard)
It seems to me all that needs to happen is that they need to cut service on Saturdays (we don't have Saturday mail here in Australia) and drastically lower their fixed costs. Easier said then done though...
Hahaha it's clear which part of the political spectrum the penultimate user is on. I would have no issue with privatisation IF the law was kept in place stipulating that the price of postage can raise no higher then inflation. The problem I have with privatisation is that if the company goes bust, it will be the end of mail as we know it. There won't be other revenue to pump into it. Additionally, who would want to buy it? Sure, there are private delivery companies, but they seem to deliver parcels/packages (correct me if I am wrong). It is unfair to blame the government, as email would have wreaked havoc, public or private. Personally, here in Australia, I don't find private sector service any better than government workers (in saying that, our service is known to suck hard)
It seems to me all that needs to happen is that they need to cut service on Saturdays (we don't have Saturday mail here in Australia) and drastically lower their fixed costs. Easier said then done though...