by R.S.V.P » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:12 pm
Volante wrote:I'm almost sure the Daniel Craig one is a fake.
Why? Well, while I'm almost 100% sure that the autographs he sent out during the filming of Casino Royale are real, and this one looks nothing like them I belive this one is a fake.
You can also hardly tell from this photo that the Daniel Craig signature is a fake. If it's a rushed in person signature it could be authentic since you don't even know if what you got back from the "Casino Royale" movie set is authentic (although all VV successes from the "Casino Royale" movie set seem to be authentic).
The most important thing is to know the history of this signed photo. Who sells it, when and where was it signed, do in person signed references exist for comparison?, etc.
The more precise informations the better to finally talk about authenticity.
Best,
Stephan
[quote="Volante"]I'm almost sure the Daniel Craig one is a fake.
Why? Well, while I'm almost 100% sure that the autographs he sent out during the filming of Casino Royale are real, and this one looks nothing like them I belive this one is a fake.[/quote]
You can also hardly tell from this photo that the Daniel Craig signature is a fake. If it's a rushed in person signature it could be authentic since you don't even know if what you got back from the "Casino Royale" movie set is authentic (although all VV successes from the "Casino Royale" movie set seem to be authentic).
The most important thing is to know the history of this signed photo. Who sells it, when and where was it signed, do in person signed references exist for comparison?, etc.
The more precise informations the better to finally talk about authenticity.
Best,
Stephan