Just wondering

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Just wondering

by Logan-Autograph-Guy » Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:16 pm

me too, I think stars that are very busy should just sign a stack of photos a month and send them out :D

by TheMailman » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:01 pm

This also crossed my mind. I hate secretarials :(

Just wondering

by orlinik28 » Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:58 am

I know this isn't really relevant but I was thinking, isn't sending out secretarials technically fraud? Shouldn't they have to say somewhere that the autograph you're receiving isn't signed by the actor?
I think it would be useful if this did happen as then at least people would know 100% what they've got.
Anyone have any thoughts? :D

Top