Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??

by lozzbeech » Sun May 27, 2007 6:08 pm

Nammzi wrote:If they are special to you then I wouldn't send them as there is a chance that you may not get them sent back. I don't see why it would ruin the photos, but it ia really up to you.
Yes.. that is true. That wouldn't be good if i didn't get them back. They are not the kind of celebs who are out and about that much though.. so would be hard to get them IP. i'll have to think more..
Thanks for replying...

by Nammzi » Sun May 27, 2007 6:04 pm

If they are special to you then I wouldn't send them as there is a chance that you may not get them sent back. I don't see why it would ruin the photos, but it ia really up to you.

Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??

by lozzbeech » Sun May 27, 2007 5:36 pm

hey guys... i have just purchased some original 1960's photographs of Carol Burnett and Julie Andrews rehearsing for one of their tv specials. They are worth quite abit of money now, do u think they would be worth more if i had them signed?? or do you think that it would spoil them a little?? i can't make up my mind....

Everyone's help/opinions would be much appreciated...

cheers........

Top