George W. Bush

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: George W. Bush

Re: George W. Bush

by rev4904 » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:24 am

Most of the people he signed for following the State of the Union were not members of congress. Think about how easy it would be for them to get a signed letter etc if they were interested. Those people were likely congressional aides, staffers and other guests invited to the speech.
And for Bill's recent change of heart to signing, I think it has a lot to do with Hillary's campaign so it will probably be short lived.

Re: George W. Bush

by PoliticalKid92 » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:28 pm

Um, it matters if you find a good address.
I got my John Edwards via venue so I don't know about a solid address.

Re: George W. Bush

by jasonw » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:18 am

PoliticalKid92 wrote:I do think he'll be a good signer when he leaves office. He seems to love to sign, and he was a great signer in person during his campaign the first time!

Clinton isn't a good enough signer for me though, he signs great in person but TTM he ****! :shock:
Hey!
Since John Edwards pulled out, do you think he will now sign ttm?
jason. ;-)

Re: George W. Bush

by PoliticalKid92 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:59 pm

I do think he'll be a good signer when he leaves office. He seems to love to sign, and he was a great signer in person during his campaign the first time!

Clinton isn't a good enough signer for me though, he signs great in person but TTM he sucks! :shock:

Re: George W. Bush

by RuleroftheWorld » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:24 pm

Shambler wrote:
No, I wasnt accusing you of anything! I was just stating in general thats what happens when email addresses get posted on here.
My apologies - just thought that was aimed at me! Sorry bout that {thumb2}
No worries.

Re: George W. Bush

by Shambler » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:06 pm

No, I wasnt accusing you of anything! I was just stating in general thats what happens when email addresses get posted on here.
My apologies - just thought that was aimed at me! Sorry bout that {thumb2}

Re: George W. Bush

by RuleroftheWorld » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:02 pm

Shambler wrote:Andy if you're assuming that I just 'jumped on the bandwagon', then good luck to you mate - that's your own (wrong) opinion. I'm very interested in world politics and at the beginning of the month decided to start collecting political/historical figures. Some of us who use the email option don't have any form of income and so therefore saving on postage is very helpful. If you still have a problem with that, then please buy my stamps for me ;)
No, I wasnt accusing you of anything! I was just stating in general thats what happens when email addresses get posted on here.

Re: George W. Bush

by Shambler » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm

Andy if you're assuming that I just 'jumped on the bandwagon', then good luck to you mate - that's your own (wrong) opinion. I'm very interested in world politics and at the beginning of the month decided to start collecting political/historical figures. Some of us who use the email option don't have any form of income and so therefore saving on postage is very helpful. If you still have a problem with that, then please buy my stamps for me ;)

Re: George W. Bush

by RuleroftheWorld » Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:36 pm

Shambler wrote:Funny you say that cos I've just emailed the White House for the 3rd time this month today asking for one of the preprints they send out. Seems that they don't even do that anymore because I got a response saying :

Due to the large volume of email recieved, the White House cannot respond to every message. Thank you for taking the time to write.
Thats what happens when email addresses get posted, people jump on the bandwagon just for the sake of adding an autograph to their collection, whether its real or not, whether they're a fan or not, etc etc. Its ridiculous and ruins it for genuine fans/supporters. {down}

Re: George W. Bush

by jasonw » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:56 am

Lets hope so, I mean Blair signs now, and clinton does too (recently)
jason. ;-)

Top