michael jackson autograph

[lukekirkland1]

which one of these are real and if so which ones i am not sure

http://s786.photobucket.com/albums/yy14 ... 203229.png

http://s786.photobucket.com/albums/yy14 ... 201931.png

http://s786.photobucket.com/albums/yy14 ... 201006.png

please comment

[bud simpson]

First one definetly fake. 2nd one "maybe". 3rd one in dark area so I can't tell.

[tansk1]

First one is not even close.. second one is a little closer than the first but not by much. Third one I'd need a closer picture of.

[Nathan1872002]

I agree with the people who posted before me. The first one looks far from real, and the second looks like it would pass. The biggest part[s] to examine when evaluating authenticity is to look at the "M" and it's overall shape and proportion to the rest of the signature, as well as the "L" and "J" in the middle of the autograph. Jackson varied the way he did his Js but for the most part the L loop is consistent. I would say the 2nd one would be the best one of the three and the only one I'd deem to be authentic.

[musicfan]

to be honest theyre all fake..

[DAY TRIPPER]

the first one is terrible,
the 2nd one is very good, but im no expert
and the 3rd one looks almost as good as the second

[musicfan]

now that i study mj's sig the 2nd one looks ok...but honestly if you want a real one i would only buy one if there was proof...