Michelle Thomas..... Authentic! For sure!

[dancingirl1]

You are right, but I find it odd that you still find it odd for the same reason you said. Oh well.

Well you asked me "how is that odd" then AFTER me sharing my opinion with you, you say "well not really.." YOU CANT TELL ME anything, that's my opinion. So deal with it. Oh well. enjoy your success.

[Kalibakvunderbarr]

I said not really to the fact that you said they were both on white paper. Not your opinion. Opinions are like a$$ holes, everybody has one.

[dancingirl1]

I said not really to the fact that you said they were both on white paper. Not your opinion. Opinions are like a$$ holes, everybody has one.

Paper MATERIAL. And yup, that is how I feel. If you don't want others opinions, don't post. But if you don't care, CONTINUE TO POST. It doesn't bother me Bye!

[Kalibakvunderbarr]

Goodbye. I am open to other opinions. And I'm not posting to annoy you. That's the way you are making it sound. I don't mind other opinions. Just to put that out there. Goodbye. PS: with the " It doesnt bother me " I am not trying to bug you, annoy you, make you angry, etc... It's also my thread so I'm free to post freely, as you are.

[dancingirl1]

Ok.

[Sabicasforever]

Dancingirl Dancingirl Dancingirl!!!!!!!!!!!!! When will you learn. I have set back and read your comments on many threads and have come to the conclusion that you are just ignorant in all things autograph related. You have proved time and time again how little autograph knowledge you have......period! You make outlandish comments that even beginners would know, and at the same time try and act like you are something special. When i would wager that most 2 week newbies know far more than you.

So lets discuss how ignorant you are in this post and how little you know about autographs.
Now this individual in my opinion is jumping the gun on his graph. It looks like it is probably real, but when you are only comparing 2 examples, you cant make a definite determination. But i doubt anyone would bother to forge such an autograph in the first place. But i will digress.

You stated in your points of autograph analysis, if you could even call it that, that you find it odd b/c both examples are signed on paper or note cards? Why in the world would that be odd? Those are the most common materials that are signed. Note cards and pieces of paper are what a huge amount of people send out in their SASE's, and most IP people always keep them on their person b/c they are easy to carry, and you never know who you will run into. So your comment that both signatures are signed on a similar media is absurd. If you had a signed picture of someone and you saw another signed picture of that same pose, would that be odd? Would it be odd they are both pictures? Of course not. Their is nothing at all strange about the media choice.

Next you state that its always hard to tell when the person has passed away. UHHHHH......no its not. How long have you "collected" autographs? Its no harder to tell an authentic graph from a dead person than a live person as long as you have other examples. The signatures will always have the same characteristics in authentic signatures, and it doesnt matter how long they have been dead. But is suppose you are referring to the amount of exemplars available, so i wont rip into you on that one any more.

It seems every time you are questioned or put in your place, you go back to this argument that " I will fight for the truth, and people dont like that". This is just humerous, lol. It would be valid, if you knew what the truth was. You are wrong so often that half the time their is no reason to even check if your correct, people can just assume your wrong. The autographs you comment on time and time again you know nothing about. You are basing your decisions on a handful of TTM autos and maybe a few IP's but have never stopped to study the structure of the signature or any signature studies that have come out that come from members that have more experience than you will ever have. You are the most dangerous type of person to give an opinion, b/c you give your opinions based on what the autograph looks like on the surface. A great example was your comments about the Friends poster, brought up in another thread. Those were the most rediculous forgeries, from the worst seller of forgeries on the net, and you thought they were spot on. You had no knowledge on those graphs but yet you commented and acted like you had put in the work to know what authentic sigs looked like. No one, and i mean no one should listen to you. Your arguments never make since, your logic is flawed, and you literally dont know autographs......period.

How can you say you speak the TRUTH, when your never right. You dont know autographs at all, so how can you speak the truth. I guess your idea of the truth is your own flawed opinions. Yep those Clint Eastwoods TTM are real, why b/c dancinggirl thinks so, sure Bob Dylan is a great signer TTM, why, b/c dancinggirl thinks so. Anything else wouldnt be the TRUTH......Right??? In the future i am going to be calling you out as much as possible and showing your lack of knowledge and that you have no business commenting on autographs. I am sick of you trying to lord over others with your lack of knowledge and this lack of intelligence will be revealed.

I look forward to reading your reply to this as im sure you will talk about how you know what your talking about b/c you have been looking at autographed pictures for years (probably forgeries) and so you have to know what your talking about. Im sure you will talk more about the TRUTH as you think it. AFterall, if dancinggirl says its the truth it has to be. Her autograph analysis provides proof of that. Oh wait, what analysis? Her comparing autographs to examples she thinks are real based on eyeballing a few examples. You will say how you dont attack other posts and that you are just sharing opinions. But your almost always wrong and you try and portray to others that you have knowledge. And for you, that typically means insulting others or making cynical comments. Which is always funny b/c it just shows how ignorant you are.

By the way could you explain to us all why you were banned to begin with? And if your just an innocent adult boy pretending to be a girl, stalking a forum 24/7 and pretending to know what you are talking about, why do your comments have the intelligence and maturity of a high school freshman? And why when questioned do you just claim its your opinion and then clam up? Why not explain and prove your case, show examples, show specific features, consult with others, and check to see if others have already done the work that could solve the problem to begin with? Why not do that if you are an educated collector rather than just throw out insults and absurd comments? The answer is b/c you just dont know this hobby, you never will, and you dont even try. Its annoying, pitiful, amusing, and a disgrace all in one.

And before calling this a rant, why dont you read it and think about what everyone else on this site has always told you, basically that you are a fool, aka the village idiot!!

[Kalibakvunderbarr]

That was a LITTLE harsh, but that's some TRUTH right there. I may be jumping the gun a little but, 1. I contacted phynjuar ( her mother ) and she stated it was real. Also I found another one of these out and compared and hey looked alot alike. So it's most likely/ probably authentic. As I just thought this conversation was setting down, after that last comment, I think we are going to be on for a ride. ;/. Also too, not many people would try to forge it. It was an IP success at a studio.

[dancingirl1]

Dancingirl Dancingirl Dancingirl!!!!!!!!!!!!! When will you learn. I have set back and read your comments on many threads and have come to the conclusion that you are just ignorant in all things autograph related. You have proved time and time again how little autograph knowledge you have......period! You make outlandish comments that even beginners would know, and at the same time try and act like you are something special. When i would wager that most 2 week newbies know far more than you.

So lets discuss how ignorant you are in this post and how little you know about autographs.
Now this individual in my opinion is jumping the gun on his graph. It looks like it is probably real, but when you are only comparing 2 examples, you cant make a definite determination. But i doubt anyone would bother to forge such an autograph in the first place. But i will digress.

You stated in your points of autograph analysis, if you could even call it that, that you find it odd b/c both examples are signed on paper or note cards? Why in the world would that be odd? Those are the most common materials that are signed. Note cards and pieces of paper are what a huge amount of people send out in their SASE's, and most IP people always keep them on their person b/c they are easy to carry, and you never know who you will run into. So your comment that both signatures are signed on a similar media is absurd. If you had a signed picture of someone and you saw another signed picture of that same pose, would that be odd? Would it be odd they are both pictures? Of course not. Their is nothing at all strange about the media choice.

Next you state that its always hard to tell when the person has passed away. UHHHHH......no its not. How long have you "collected" autographs? Its no harder to tell an authentic graph from a dead person than a live person as long as you have other examples. The signatures will always have the same characteristics in authentic signatures, and it doesnt matter how long they have been dead. But is suppose you are referring to the amount of exemplars available, so i wont rip into you on that one any more.

It seems every time you are questioned or put in your place, you go back to this argument that " I will fight for the truth, and people dont like that". This is just humerous, lol. It would be valid, if you knew what the truth was. You are wrong so often that half the time their is no reason to even check if your correct, people can just assume your wrong. The autographs you comment on time and time again you know nothing about. You are basing your decisions on a handful of TTM autos and maybe a few IP's but have never stopped to study the structure of the signature or any signature studies that have come out that come from members that have more experience than you will ever have. You are the most dangerous type of person to give an opinion, b/c you give your opinions based on what the autograph looks like on the surface. A great example was your comments about the Friends poster, brought up in another thread. Those were the most rediculous forgeries, from the worst seller of forgeries on the net, and you thought they were spot on. You had no knowledge on those graphs but yet you commented and acted like you had put in the work to know what authentic sigs looked like. No one, and i mean no one should listen to you. Your arguments never make since, your logic is flawed, and you literally dont know autographs......period.

How can you say you speak the TRUTH, when your never right. You dont know autographs at all, so how can you speak the truth. I guess your idea of the truth is your own flawed opinions. Yep those Clint Eastwoods TTM are real, why b/c dancinggirl thinks so, sure Bob Dylan is a great signer TTM, why, b/c dancinggirl thinks so. Anything else wouldnt be the TRUTH......Right??? In the future i am going to be calling you out as much as possible and showing your lack of knowledge and that you have no business commenting on autographs. I am sick of you trying to lord over others with your lack of knowledge and this lack of intelligence will be revealed.

I look forward to reading your reply to this as im sure you will talk about how you know what your talking about b/c you have been looking at autographed pictures for years (probably forgeries) and so you have to know what your talking about. Im sure you will talk more about the TRUTH as you think it. AFterall, if dancinggirl says its the truth it has to be. Her autograph analysis provides proof of that. Oh wait, what analysis? Her comparing autographs to examples she thinks are real based on eyeballing a few examples. You will say how you dont attack other posts and that you are just sharing opinions. But your almost always wrong and you try and portray to others that you have knowledge. And for you, that typically means insulting others or making cynical comments. Which is always funny b/c it just shows how ignorant you are.

By the way could you explain to us all why you were banned to begin with? And if your just an innocent adult boy pretending to be a girl, stalking a forum 24/7 and pretending to know what you are talking about, why do your comments have the intelligence and maturity of a high school freshman? And why when questioned do you just claim its your opinion and then clam up? Why not explain and prove your case, show examples, show specific features, consult with others, and check to see if others have already done the work that could solve the problem to begin with? Why not do that if you are an educated collector rather than just throw out insults and absurd comments? The answer is b/c you just dont know this hobby, you never will, and you dont even try. Its annoying, pitiful, amusing, and a disgrace all in one.

And before calling this a rant, why dont you read it and think about what everyone else on this site has always told you, basically that you are a fool, aka the village idiot!!

LOL You made ANOTHER new account? LOL! You just love to show me attention! Thanks and I didn't even bother to read that whole mess...LOL! I have opinions and so do you...It's as simple as that. Peace. (but thanks for showing me attention AGAIN.)

[dancingirl1]

That was a LITTLE harsh, but that's some TRUTH right there. I may be jumping the gun a little but, 1. I contacted phynjuar ( her mother ) and she stated it was real. Also I found another one of these out and compared and hey looked alot alike. So it's most likely/ probably authentic. As I just thought this conversation was setting down, after that last comment, I think we are going to be on for a ride. ;/. Also too, not many people would try to forge it. It was an IP success at a studio.

Just so you know: Snooki's (from the Jersey Shore) mom says the exact same thing: "her's are real as well...'', BUT she is the one who forges them...LOL, so that stuff does happen. And no that long post wasn't harsh. People have the right to have an opinion about someone or something. It's cool yo. I really don't care what a stranger who makes 5 different accounts thinks of me. HAHAHA!! I really don't. Like I said if you are happy with it, I am happy for YOU. Honest. I was just commenting on it like everyone else does in the "IS MY AUTOGRAPH AUTHENTIC" section.. Take care of that autograph.

[Kalibakvunderbarr]

I will take care of it. I do think it's real. But, there is a difference between snookis mom and michelles. First, snooki is alive and well. Michelle Thomas is dead. Her mother lied for her daughters publicity. Michelle Thomas is dead. What reason would there be to lie? She's been gone for almost 14 years now. I'm just saying that there aren't many reasons to lie about michelles autograph.