James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Are you unsure if your autograph is authentic or not? Post it in here and the Fanmail.biz community will try to clear it up for you.
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Chris102
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:24 pm
Contact:

James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by Chris102 »

I have some evidence that James Garner might be secretarial :neutral:

I sent a letter, a picture, index card, and SASE to his address in Los Angeles. I got my picture and card back signed, but the envelope was postmarked at the Kilmer Post Office, which is in Edison, New Jersey.

Only possible explanation I can possibly think of is that maybe since I am in Pennsylvania, it traveled from California and ended up in Jersey, where it was postmarked? Or, the envelope was sent from Jersey, which means he more than likely didn't sign them.
RYAN J.

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by RYAN J. »

Maybe he was on the road at the time and took some fan mail with him, & when he spotted a post office decided to send them out.

I'm pretty sure he signs authentic. Just because it was mailed from a different state than you sent it to, doesn't mean it's secretarial.

RYAN J. 8)
Chris102
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:24 pm
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by Chris102 »

RYAN J. wrote:Maybe he was on the road at the time and took some fan mail with him, & when he spotted a post office decided to send them out.

I'm pretty sure he signs authentic. Just because it was mailed from a different state than you sent it to, doesn't mean it's secretarial.

RYAN J. 8)
Thanks for your input. But I don't think he was traveling and decided to send them out - I have heard of Jersey postmarks on things from him before. Strange, because he does not have a home here - he lives in Los Angeles.
autoland
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:42 am
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by autoland »

Chris102 wrote:
RYAN J. wrote:Maybe he was on the road at the time and took some fan mail with him, & when he spotted a post office decided to send them out.

I'm pretty sure he signs authentic. Just because it was mailed from a different state than you sent it to, doesn't mean it's secretarial.

RYAN J. 8)
Thanks for your input. But I don't think he was traveling and decided to send them out - I have heard of Jersey postmarks on things from him before. Strange, because he does not have a home here - he lives in Los Angeles.

You may have a point there. All these replys are coming from his fan club, His address is the one that we send them too??

Every one has the same post code?? add to this that the date mark, on my letter would have put him in hospital at the time? (He had a stoke the day before) so he could not have possibly signed it.

And yes he does live in Los Angeles, so then someone collects his post, takes it to New Jersey, then sends them off??

Answer: there all secretarials {down} {down} :roll: :? :mad:

More Proof: his fan club Address is: the James Garner Fan Club, Pat Persico president, 33 Woodbury road, Edison NJ 08820.

And on one website, it said this is the only address, that James Garner would accept fan mail.
Why?? because yes sir he dont sign them, but some sec does.

Now give me proof that they're authentic PLEASE.
autoland
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:42 am
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by autoland »

Oh the killer blow, on this one is the distance from the address, we send to and the postmark is over 2700 miles, so he gets fanmail sends them 2700 miles to be signed, then there all sent out.

Another fake exposed: bring them on.
lizane
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:35 pm
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by lizane »

Hi autoland! ;-)

You have a very good point there. {up} Does anyone have an in person example of his autograph?

I'll add him to the secretarial list.

Thanks again,
zanne
Chris102
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:24 pm
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by Chris102 »

zanne wrote:Does anyone have an in person example of his autograph?
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like anyone does. I've searched all over the internet, and can't find one.
lizane
Posts: 2011
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:35 pm
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by lizane »

Thanks Chris! ;) I also couldn't find any at AutographWorld.com...
User avatar
guilder1st
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:42 pm
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by guilder1st »

I have an IP from James Garner, I'll try to upload a picture later today.
autoland
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:42 am
Contact:

Re: James Garner - Possible Secretarial Evidence

Unread post by autoland »

At the end of the day, even if the autographs match, the IP (And I believe it does) It's still 110% that the TTM are SECRETARIALS.

I said it in my last post, he recieves the post/mail then sends it 2700 miles away to be signed and then sent to us??? (Sorry without a los angeles postmark) its a secretarial.

Ok let's put it this way: I live in london England, and say if I where a celeb, and if you sent me fanmail, then I sent that fanmail, to Ghana to be signed by someone there, well it's sure not me, who's signing it.

What I could do if everyone is happy, is to write to the fanclub, who answers all he mail, and get them to explain (if they can)


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest