Page 1 of 1
Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:12 pm
by tyredsox
I go this and I am not sure if it is real or not. I got it through Omega Watches, but anyways, here is the picture. Please help me out!:
Thanks.

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:01 am
by jasonw
Hi there
I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:
The autograph you have should be authentic.
Jason

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:54 pm
by tyredsox
YES! OMG you do not know hot happy you made me. Thank you so much!
Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:05 pm
by jasonw
No problem

Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:42 pm
by devilson9991
The Michelle Wie autograph is a preprint, Omega watches sends out PPs.
Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:33 pm
by tyredsox
That guy says its real, and you can tell as well.
Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:25 pm
by devilson9991
Now that you say it, the Michelle Wie that you received looks different from the preprint I received a little while ago from Omega Watches.
Mine looks EXACTLY like this:
http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/5855 ... ie1km7.jpg
Just check to see if it's a preprint or not:
Hold the photo up near eye level at an angle towards a source of light and look at the signature. If the signature appears to be "under" the gloss, or if the signature disappears altogether, that's a strong indication that it is preprinted into the photo. A hand-written signature will appear "on top" of the gloss and will not disappear when held at an angle towards light.
Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:32 pm
by tyredsox
It reflects by itself, the things seem separate, so I think it is authentic.
Re: Michelle Wie, Real or not?
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:45 am
by autographfanno1
jasonw wrote:Hi there
I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:
The autograph you have should be authentic.
Jason

Jason - with that comparison you think it's authentic? The bit where it goes down in the TTM looks almost triangular whereas in the authentic it's curved. The start is just plain wrong too - in the authentics it NEVER loops round. The end looks nothing like authentics either - the others loop round whereas that does a sharp turn then a downwards curve. Add to that the autograph is broken towards the end and all the evidence points to it being a sec.