Michelle Wie, Real or not?

[tyredsox]

I go this and I am not sure if it is real or not. I got it through Omega Watches, but anyways, here is the picture. Please help me out!:
Thanks.

[jasonw]

Hi there

I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:



The autograph you have should be authentic.

Jason

[tyredsox]

YES! OMG you do not know hot happy you made me. Thank you so much!

[jasonw]

No problem

[devilson9991]

The Michelle Wie autograph is a preprint, Omega watches sends out PPs.

[tyredsox]

That guy says its real, and you can tell as well.

[devilson9991]

Now that you say it, the Michelle Wie that you received looks different from the preprint I received a little while ago from Omega Watches.
Mine looks EXACTLY like this:
http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/5855 ... ie1km7.jpg

Just check to see if it's a preprint or not:
Hold the photo up near eye level at an angle towards a source of light and look at the signature. If the signature appears to be "under" the gloss, or if the signature disappears altogether, that's a strong indication that it is preprinted into the photo. A hand-written signature will appear "on top" of the gloss and will not disappear when held at an angle towards light.

[tyredsox]

It reflects by itself, the things seem separate, so I think it is authentic.

[autographfanno1]

Hi there

I have compared your autograph to a rush and complete version of Michelle's autograph:



The autograph you have should be authentic.

Jason

Jason - with that comparison you think it's authentic? The bit where it goes down in the TTM looks almost triangular whereas in the authentic it's curved. The start is just plain wrong too - in the authentics it NEVER loops round. The end looks nothing like authentics either - the others loop round whereas that does a sharp turn then a downwards curve. Add to that the autograph is broken towards the end and all the evidence points to it being a sec.