Fanmail.biz

Hi, so, is he sending back orginal or secretarial autographs? I'm just curious, maybe u will know the answer...

He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.

guilder1st wrote:He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.

we do not know 100% if it a sec. but it could be real or not? nobody is 100% real

Huh, I think secretarials are better than PP, but eaven if he's not giving orginals, I'll write him a letter..

tinki wrote:Huh, I think secretarials are better than PP, but eaven if he's not giving orginals, I'll write him a letter..

sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better

ryco11756 wrote:

guilder1st wrote:He has been sending out secretarials for a very long time now.

we do not know 100% if it a sec. but it could be real or not? nobody is 100% real

Actually I do know this 100% for sure. I know this from various people that work with him at his wb studio office. Also there has been many comparisons and discussions about this in the past few years by many dealers and autograph experts on various forums and websites. They all come to the same conclusion.
But you are of course entitled to believe w/e you want to believe.

ryco11756 wrote: sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better

Hmm, maybe.. Sec are very similar to orginal autographs, and they are often personalised. If somebody doesn't know which is orginal, and which is sec (it's quite hard to distinguish), u can be very proud of that what u have got. But in fact similar isn't same as orginal, so I think u are quite right...

tinki wrote:

ryco11756 wrote: sorry but i have to disagree with you ..sec are fake autograph that someone foreged clint's signature.... a pp is a copy of the real signature. which is much better

Hmm, maybe.. Sec are very similar to orginal autographs, and they are often personalised. If somebody doesn't know which is orginal, and which is sec (it's quite hard to distinguish), u can be very proud of that what u have got. But in fact similar isn't same as orginal, so I think u are quite right...

This is just my opinion, but having a "forged" autograph that is good enough to "trick" people who don't know better isn't something I'd be particularly proud of; definitely not proud of more than having some other kind of inauthentic autograph. I'd rather have a celeb who's honest about not having the time to sign and just send preprints and not try to pretend to sign everything sent to them.