Page 1 of 1
Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:37 am
by AxlSlash
This is NOT MY SUCCESS, it is from MusicFan's post last week, but I'm about to send to the same address.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:29 pm
by crystal815
First - I dont think we should make posts questioning OTHER peoples successes.
Second - It looks real in comparrison.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:23 pm
by paulmustang1
The reason why he did it was to get an opion on the autograph on it's authenticity.Personally i'm not sure not really a fan of his sorry.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:25 pm
by AxlSlash
I'm not asking about his specific request, I'm just looking for the conventional wisdom on this particular address and its resulting successes. Sorry if I caused anyone harm etc. by using this as an example.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:15 pm
by guilder1st
crystal815 wrote:First - I dont think we should make posts questioning OTHER peoples successes.
Second - It looks real in comparrison.
First - There's nothing wrong with asking if a success is authentic or not, especially if you are planning to send to the same address. Nobody wants to waste stamps.
Second - Shia's responses are known to be secretarial autographs. Zanne (liz) did an in depth comparison not too long ago, which I'm sure could still be found somewhere in the authenticity forum if you looked for it. And No, it does not look real in comparison to authentic in person examples.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:36 pm
by AxlSlash
I found the one done by "yellow," which included several in-person authentics. Honestly, his sig is not nearly consistent enough in person to be sure TTM. I'll just hope that it's real if I get a success!
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:42 pm
by wlperie
I also believe that Shia's TTM successes are secretarial. The signature is so easy to forge and his IP signatures do look different.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:47 pm
by crystal815
guilder1st wrote:crystal815 wrote:First - I dont think we should make posts questioning OTHER peoples successes.
Second - It looks real in comparrison.
First - There's nothing wrong with asking if a success is authentic or not, especially if you are planning to send to the same address. Nobody wants to waste stamps.
Second - Shia's responses are known to be secretarial autographs. Zanne (liz) did an in depth comparison not too long ago, which I'm sure could still be found somewhere in the authenticity forum if you looked for it. And No, it does not look real in comparison to authentic in person examples.
FIRST- u dont have to be a douchebag about it. opinions were wanted, and opinions were given. This is why this website is going under fast. Too many rude people. Getting opinions on OTHER peoples successes undermines the orginal obtainers success. If THEY dont ask about authenticity, I dont think we should be debating it. What if they are happy with what they got, and come to find someone questioning it? Or what if someone is has a tiff with someone (which seems to happen quite a bit on here) and wants to cut down someone else? Its really not fair.
SECOND- In comparison to other successes, it is real. Secretarial or not, its the same... IE, not a pp or autopen. Shia's autograph would be very easy to forge. That being said, you never know what you are getting TTM for sure.
FYI: I have a degree in chemical engineering, dont talk to me like one of your little teeny boppers.
Re: Shia LaBeouf
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:52 pm
by guilder1st
What's with the rude response. I reread my response to your post, and there was no rudeness or foul language in it. It wasn't supposed to be an assault on your opinion. Just my opinion about the original post, and the authenticity of the autograph.
FYI: Don't be calling me names, I am not one of YOUR 'teeny bopper' friends either. I don't care about your degree, you don't know who I am, don't assume that you know anything about me.
I will now close this topic as the original question has been answered, and to avoid further 'arguments'.