Page 1 of 1
??
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:34 pm
by xBethany.
Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:24 pm
by xBethany.
Anyone?

Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:44 pm
by mufcdd
I have an opinion, the same as for most (if not all) Jackson "Is it real" questions on this site. Its fake, avoid.
Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:13 pm
by xBethany.
How can you tell?
Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:16 pm
by mufcdd
xBethany. wrote:How can you tell?
Because the seller is selling numerous fakes.
They're actually all preprints as well, but preprints of fakes is even worse lol
Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:21 pm
by xBethany.
Uhh... no they aren't

Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:29 pm
by mufcdd
xBethany. wrote:Uhh... no they aren't

Uhhh yes they are.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/125-MICHAEL-JACKS ... 0426359756
1) Its listed under pre-prints.
2) The listing itself states "THE SIGNATURE ON THIS MOUNT IS A REPRINT ( NOT AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE)"
3) The signatures all are identical, on account of them being printed.
So how exactly am I wrong?
The seller has tonnes of pre-prints, and I looked at quite a few, which were all PPs of fakes.
Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:37 pm
by xBethany.
Ooh SORRY!
I did not buy from that seller, sorry for not looking around
I can't believe how rude your reply was!

Re: ??
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:07 pm
by mufcdd
My reply wasnt rude, YOURS was.
You asked for opinions, I gave one.
You asked how I knew, I told you.
Then you told me I was wrong.
So (for a 2nd time) I told you I was not wrong, and again showed you why its not legit.
How is that rude? Your comment of "uhhh no its not" was rude as it showed a total disregard for everything I said.
I replied with my own "uhhhh yes it is" because I knew you'd not taken on board what I'd said.
Why'd you buy it without knowing what you were buying though?
Re: ??
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:00 am
by DAY TRIPPER
doesnt look good to me,
i wouldnt trust it