Page 1 of 2
Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:52 pm
by FCB_Phil
Bought this from an IP collector, who said that it is 100% real.
For me it looks good and it matches to some authentic IPs.
But whats your opinion?
Thanks
FCB_Phil
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:21 pm
by super11
It looks like a pre-print but it always looks different on the computer than in person
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:27 pm
by Brownie
May I ask who this IP collector was? I ask because it's quite easy to fake Tom Hanks' signature. That being said, it does however have similiar characteristics of the Tom Hanks autograph I got when I met him in-person in NYC.
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:28 pm
by FCB_Phil
It was Simon from London.
He said that he got it in NY too.
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:34 pm
by Brownie
FCB_Phil wrote:It was Simon from London.
He said that he got it in NY too.
I'm afraid the name doesn't ring a bell. Lol. In any event, I still believe it matches the IP I got a few years ago. If it's not a pre-print, then I would say it is authentic.
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:36 pm
by FCB_Phil
Would be good
He is a user here on this forum, said he's known as airport simon in London.
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:33 pm
by FCB_Phil
Anyone else?
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:49 pm
by bud simpson
I think its real and not a pre-print. First of all if it were indeed a pre-print why would the signature be on the face? Usually with a pre-print or autopen the signature is placed in a more desirable area on the photo. Also this looks like the in person Hanks that I got on the set of his latest film, Larry Crowne. So I think its good.
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:37 am
by FCB_Phil
Ok, thanks very much for all your comments!
I had a closer look on the sig and can say that it's 100% not a PP or AP.
So this might be authentic!
Best,
FCB_Phil
Re: Tom Hanks
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:44 pm
by super11
Is the signature shiny...usually when it's shiny it's a pp