Tom Hanks

bud simpson · Unread post by **bud simpson** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:37 pm

No I don't think so. It could just be a refection of light from somewhere. Also note the start of the T in Tom. There are certain area's where you can see that it's darker where the sharpie started. I'm still convienced its good.

super11 · Unread post by **super11** » Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:22 am

good point...ya im also convinced that it is good

bud simpson · Unread post by **bud simpson** » Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:55 am

One more point. If it were a pre-print I don't think it would be on a paparazzi photo. It would tend to be image from a photo shoot or a publicity still from one of his movies.

FCB_Phil · Unread post by **FCB_Phil** » Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:06 pm

I can assure you that it's not a PP.
I can see clearly the pen marks.
I could only be an AP, but I don't know anything about a Hanks ap and I'm 99,9% sure that it isn't.

Best regards and thank you again for your very helpful comments!
FCB_Phil

super11 · Unread post by **super11** » Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 pm

Oh yeah..it's a paparazzi photo so it can't be a pp

Tom Hanks

Re: Tom Hanks

Re: Tom Hanks

Re: Tom Hanks

Re: Tom Hanks

Re: Tom Hanks

Who is online


Fanmail.biz	Message Board