Page 1 of 1

Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:53 pm
by Di Petrio
I sent letter to Peter Falk few years ago and recieved a reply from his assistant, he just thanked me for the letter.
He send my picture back with a sticker whit autograph attached to the white part of my picture.

http://yfrog.com/9f17112017p

I think it was not autographed by the assistant, because he did not need a sticker for that. It could not be autopenned for the same reason.
But it could be printed. How do you think about it?

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:33 pm
by Brownie
I sent him a request over 4 years ago and got an autopen as a reply. He's been in poor health for a long time now and hasn't been able to sign.

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:14 am
by capmonte
I think Peter Falk sent autopen responses for years. I wrote to him a good twenty years ago (my god that makes me feel old), and it was definitely an autopenned photo.

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:45 pm
by Di Petrio
And how your photo looks like?
I also have black-white autopenned photo.

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:25 pm
by capmonte
This is mine (sorry about the blurry scan, did it quickly):

Image

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:59 pm
by Di Petrio
I have the same photo with autopenned "My very best, Peter Falk"
But I don't know what to think about another one.

Re: Peter Falk - is it authentic?

Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:25 pm
by Di Petrio
So, has anybody any ideas?