Fanmail.biz

Hello!
This is the first time I have ever sent letters asking for signed photos, I expected to get nothing back, I sent my LOR and a return address envelope (non stamped) with a photo of Daniel in inside.
I took it to a local printers near me to get the photo printed they use a type of photo paper called Fugifilm which is watermarked on the back of the photo like most photo paper.

I sent the letter off on the 31st of October this year, and received the photo back signed on the forth of November! very quickly!

At first i was certain it was a pre print, but then i noticed the photo paper was fugifilm! like the one i had printed at the shop and it was the same photo, anybody who has a signed photo of Daniel please could you check the photo paper on the back of the photo and tell me if it is Fugifilm or another brand?
That way i can be sure its authentic! sorry i dont have a photo of the original photo i got sent back my phone is broken and normally id use that to put photos on my pc. I have put a photo up of how it looks (the same photo i used)
http://www.ebay.com/itm/DANIEL-RADCLIFF ... 1197700962

Thanks so much!

Nope, not authentic, sorry to say. The Ebay description actually says it's not hand-signed. It's a reproduction. Hence it's meager $9 price tag. A genuine Radcliffe goes for between $100-$200 (depending on the item).

Ah yes, But the eBay one is not the one i actually have, It just looks a bit like it, Its the same photo i printed and sent him, when it came back it looks identical to the one i sent off, the same size photo same photo paper make and its even pixilated a little where the quality of the picture was not great, I tired to upload picture of it but for some reason it wont let me x Thank you for your help so far

Instead why don't you just look at the one you received against the one on Ebay and see if the signatures are the exact same.