Used the address in the database
Sent 8/13/11
Received 10/8/11
No envelope

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
I thought it looked pretty good compared to other signatures I've seen from him. Any other opinions on this?bigfoot215 wrote:Secretarial.
why do you think this is a "Secretarial"? If your going to say such a thing you prolly should elaborate. Im not expert & doubt you are but the certs i see on ebay look pretty close to the same as this one.bigfoot215 wrote:Secretarial.
i also thought the B looked a bit off but the E looked pretty consistent to me. any & most secs i have ever seen have been pretty clear sec sigs. Im not saying blatant obvious returns like Tony Gonzalez for example but sec returns that you can tell a small effort was made, but pretty clear not who the intended signers sig.Eddie08 wrote:The E and the B look just a little off but the "rnie" and "anks" look pretty good. If it is fake, I'd say it's a pretty good secretary he has.
Been collecting over 40 years, have the authentic autographs of nearly every HOF member. There are variations between Ernie's signature and that of his ghost signer. Both capital letters are off and the ks is questionable, as well. It's well known that Ernie does not sign TTM without a fee. In the oft chance that Ernie actually signed this item for you, congrats, but I wouldn't hold my breath on it.macainautos wrote:bigfoot is an idiot, that's a real auto. He's just trying to rain on your parade. Just another bigmouth with no proof...
R-Mac
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests