Just because the original poster said that they "believe" that it was pre-signed by Taylor Swift doesn't make it true.araleejane wrote:like the original post said "pre-signed".


Just because the original poster said that they "believe" that it was pre-signed by Taylor Swift doesn't make it true.araleejane wrote:like the original post said "pre-signed".
Which completely negates your original argument.joe316 wrote:All the management has to do is sign her name and people will think that it was her that sent the photo to them.
Her signature is extremely easy to tell if it's legit! If what you're saying is true, who's to say what they sell on her site aren't just secs toojoe316 wrote:Just because the original poster said that they "believe" that it was pre-signed by Taylor Swift doesn't make it true.araleejane wrote:like the original post said "pre-signed".They weren't there to actually see her pre-signing all these photos that I highly doubt that she would have "pre-signed" so many of them out of all the successes posted on this forum. Originally people thought that she may have pre-signed a few for the few fans that might contact her management. It is obvious that she didn't sign them at all. Some of them are even personalized while others aren't. Nobody seems to try and explain that one. If it is her management is doing it then why didn't they do it for all the autographs.
There is no way that her manager would want the non-personalized ones to just be put up at some auction house. But they know that these are all fake and if someone tried to sell them the auction house's experts would know it is fake. And like MW1221 said it is obvious that the general public can't tell the difference between a legitimate Taylor Swift autograph and a fake. All the management has to do is sign her name and people will think that it was her that sent the photo to them.
A very good pointMW1221 wrote:I don't know if these are real or not, but I do know that the general public can't tell the difference between a real and fake autograph, so sending anything that appears to be signed by Taylor (whether it actually is or not) would have the same effect as sending something actually signed by Taylor in that regard.joe316 wrote:Stop making dumb comments like this its not as if the signed photos that they send out are real anyway. Despite everyone that got them so desperately claiming that they are real. Anyone else that knows anything at all about Taylor Swift knows that she won't send anything to a fan that might turn them into another potential stalker. Anything sent by her management is fake unless you saw it signed by her in person.Nathan1872002 wrote:Go ahead and disable your PM feature. As someone who also has an e-mail address for their company please respect it enough not to give it out to anyone.![]()
This forum seems to be the only one with stupid autograph collectors that refuse to believe the consensus.
Best of luck! I hate it when I find an email and Mailer Demon on Yahoo! shows up.rachelj wrote:Hi! That is so cool! Congrats! I have emailed someone too, but I have no idea if it is the right one!
You should just go back under the rock that you crawled out from. People like you that brag about successes that you know you won't give out an address to are just pathetic.jedwardcanfly wrote:thanks for the feedback
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests