Doris Day fake success
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial


- prettykittyjenna
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
She does those interviews every year in Northern California. I did see one other one but it's rare.
Re: Doris Day fake success
I don't know if you know what a hermit is, but by definition, hermits don't release CD's, under any name.
And those photos she took to promote the animal foundation? They're the ones that are being signed and mailed out. Or is that also her sec?
I'm also going to throw this out there--The only evidence of Doris Day being a recluse that I can find is in a "stupid" unauthorized biography (as said by her rep), photos of her taken by paparazzi while she was out shopping, and things written in tabloids that were revoked after she successfully sued them. Her rep denied it. So, I'm starting to wonder how factual your fact is.
Also, by definition, hermits don't read tabloids or file lawsuits. So.. Yeah. She's a horrible hermit.
She also did a phone interview for Parade Magazine a few months ago. By definition, hermits don't own phones.
And those photos she took to promote the animal foundation? They're the ones that are being signed and mailed out. Or is that also her sec?
I'm also going to throw this out there--The only evidence of Doris Day being a recluse that I can find is in a "stupid" unauthorized biography (as said by her rep), photos of her taken by paparazzi while she was out shopping, and things written in tabloids that were revoked after she successfully sued them. Her rep denied it. So, I'm starting to wonder how factual your fact is.
Also, by definition, hermits don't read tabloids or file lawsuits. So.. Yeah. She's a horrible hermit.
She also did a phone interview for Parade Magazine a few months ago. By definition, hermits don't own phones.
- prettykittyjenna
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
Well I don't think people should mail to her regardless of if she is a hermit or not.MW1221 wrote:I don't know if you know what a hermit is, but by definition, hermits don't release CD's, under any name.
And those photos she took to promote the animal foundation? They're the ones that are being signed and mailed out. Or is that also her sec?
I'm also going to throw this out there--The only evidence of Doris Day being a recluse that I can find is in a "stupid" unauthorized biography (as said by her rep), photos of her taken by paparazzi while she was out shopping, and things written in tabloids that were revoked after she successfully sued them. Her rep denied it. So, I'm starting to wonder how factual your fact is.
Also, by definition, hermits don't read tabloids or file lawsuits. So.. Yeah. She's a horrible hermit.
She also did a phone interview for Parade Magazine a few months ago. By definition, hermits don't own phones.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 5352
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
Tell me five celebs that use a sec that have admitted to doing so...countpaul wrote: they said they were not.
Britney Spears==>> 6 #1 albums. 2 diamond albums. 8 platinum albums. 400+ awards. 200M+ records sold. Britney has sold over 45 million records this decade despite only releasing three albums. Globally, Britney has more #1 singles than any other female artist except Madonna and Rihanna. "Oops!...I Did It Again" by Britney is the 5th best selling album of the 2000s decade worldwide. Britney is the only female artist to chart her first seven albums in the top two of the Billboard 200. Britney has achieved at least one #1 album in 3 different decades (90's, 00's, 10's). Britney is the first solo female artist from the 90's to reach 1 billion Spotify streams. Despite NOT even being a single, 'Tom's Diner', ft. Britney , has become Giorgio Moroders best-selling digital track. 2015 Billboard Awards ratings reached a 14-year high, with numbers peaking during Britney's performance. She IS the princess of Pop. Bow Down! #StayMadHaters
Re: Doris Day fake success
So let me get this straight..prettykittyjenna wrote:Well I don't think people should mail to her regardless of if she is a hermit or not.MW1221 wrote:I don't know if you know what a hermit is, but by definition, hermits don't release CD's, under any name.
And those photos she took to promote the animal foundation? They're the ones that are being signed and mailed out. Or is that also her sec?
I'm also going to throw this out there--The only evidence of Doris Day being a recluse that I can find is in a "stupid" unauthorized biography (as said by her rep), photos of her taken by paparazzi while she was out shopping, and things written in tabloids that were revoked after she successfully sued them. Her rep denied it. So, I'm starting to wonder how factual your fact is.
Also, by definition, hermits don't read tabloids or file lawsuits. So.. Yeah. She's a horrible hermit.
She also did a phone interview for Parade Magazine a few months ago. By definition, hermits don't own phones.
The facts we actually know are as follows:
1) Doris Day isn't a hermit
2) Doris Day isn't shunning her Hollywood past
3) The inscriptions have remained the same over 20+ years, only the signature has changed
4) According to her rep, she goes by her birth name Doris Kappelhoff, not Clara, but still embraces the name Doris Day
And even though those four facts (used here to actually mean facts, not that unsubstantiated bull that you wrote above) are in direct opposition to ALL the reasons you gave as to why you believe her signatures to be sec, you still believe her signatures to be sec?
It's been said that the definition of stupid is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. I think the definition should be changed to believing that a plank on top of four pillars will remain in the air when the four pillars are pulled out from underneath it.
- prettykittyjenna
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
Good point! No one ever would!dancingirl1 wrote:Tell me five celebs that use a sec that have admitted to doing so...countpaul wrote: they said they were not.
- megara1975
- $10 gift certificate winner
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 5:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
Wow this is really getting heated. Let's all just agree to disagree huh?
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, time to give it a rest.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, time to give it a rest.
- prettykittyjenna
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
I totally agree!megara1975 wrote:Wow this is really getting heated. Let's all just agree to disagree huh?
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, time to give it a rest.
Re: Doris Day fake success
And for those of us (such as myself) who have no opinion, it does nothing when people who have them can't support them.megara1975 wrote:Wow this is really getting heated. Let's all just agree to disagree huh?
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, time to give it a rest.
The point of these threads is to discuss the authenticity of the signatures to decide whether they're worth the time and money to acquire them. I don't know what to believe. This other user says no, but has absolutely no solid reasoning for it. Not to mention, there's the slander aspect (I highly doubt Ms. Day or Kappelhoff or whatever would appreciate being called a hermit. In fact, I know she wouldn't, considering she sued a tabloid for $20+ million for calling her that, among other things).
But of course, this is the Internet. So, let's be like any other Internet community, where people make unsubstantiated claims based on nothing in an effort to persuade other people to their way of thinking, yet can't address those people's questions, and spread tabloid rumors about celebrities. There's no reason whatsoever this site or its users should strive to be better than that.. None at all.
- prettykittyjenna
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Doris Day fake success
LOL give it a rest already!! Do you have to have the last word??MW1221 wrote:And for those of us (such as myself) who have no opinion, it does nothing when people who have them can't support them.megara1975 wrote:Wow this is really getting heated. Let's all just agree to disagree huh?
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, time to give it a rest.
The point of these threads is to discuss the authenticity of the signatures to decide whether they're worth the time and money to acquire them. I don't know what to believe. This other user says no, but has absolutely no solid reasoning for it. Not to mention, there's the slander aspect (I highly doubt Ms. Day or Kappelhoff or whatever would appreciate being called a hermit. In fact, I know she wouldn't, considering she sued a tabloid for $20+ million for calling her that, among other things).
But of course, this is the Internet. So, let's be like any other Internet community, where people make unsubstantiated claims based on nothing in an effort to persuade other people to their way of thinking, yet can't address those people's questions, and spread tabloid rumors about celebrities. There's no reason whatsoever this site or its users should strive to be better than that.. None at all.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests