Fanmail.biz

cool success! Did you send a SASE or just LOR

davidcook412 wrote:cool success! Did you send a SASE or just LOR

I sent a SASE as well as 2 8x10s of the 3 of them and a letter.

Silly me - I give up, was trying to help out the OP with some examples of genuine autos & info Have better things to do than bicker with certain users who I was not even addressing in first place. FUnny I thought the whole point of the forum was to try to help each other out with info - obviously not!

paleo007 wrote:Great success yesterday, I recieved 3 photos signed from the KKKK sisters. Although they did not sign or return the 2 8x10s I originally sent for them to autograph, I am still happy with the success. I used the address listed here on the fanmail.biz page http://www.fanmail.biz/109281.html

Sent: September 3rd, 2011
Success: October 11th, 2011

Envelope:


Autographs:
5'9" Khloé Kardashian-Odom

5'2" Kim Kardashian-Humphries

5'0" Kourtney Kardashian

Nice, looks real to me.

buffysatine wrote:I think you will find these are pre-prints or secs - I have not seen anyone get authentic signatures from that address & the fact your photos were not signed further proves that point.

Since her marriage AUTHENTIC Khloe autographs she always signs Khloe K Odom
Kims are meant to be a very good SEC
Kourtney I am not sure of

All 3 girls are never at the DASH boutique together anymore & you had a quick turn around as well.

Huh? That is a huge gap in logic. Whilst I agree Kim's is almost definately a sec, the fact that these pre-signed pics were sent instead of the ops actually increases the chances they are real .

Seems that by trying to help out the OP with some genuine examples & info from my expereince over the years collecting is called arguing? I swear some users on here have nothing better to do than try to start fights

Oh for gods sake grow up, stop arguing and use some common sense.

Paleo sent some pics to get signed. He did not get them back. Instead, he got these pre signed pics. Now, these COULD theoretically have been signed at any point over the past few years. The girls did not have to be at the address at any point during the ''window'' of time for these to potentially be real. Whereas had his pic been signed, for it to be authentic, all three girls would have had to have been at that address at some point during the window. That is why, using pure common sense, all things being equal, a pre signed pic is more likely to be real then your own pic signed. It does not guarantee authenticity, nor does it condem your supplied pic to being a sec. It just increases the % in your favour. However, it seems in this case, Paleo has been unfortunate enough to recieve a pre signed sec.

buffysatine wrote:Seems that by trying to help out the OP with some genuine examples & info from my expereince over the years collecting is called arguing? I swear some users on here have nothing better to do than try to start fights

I do not call it arguing buffysatine

These are secs.