Fanmail.biz

Sent: July 2012
Received: September 10, 2012
What I sent: LOR, SASE, 2 pictures
What I received: My photos signed and a photocopied drawing of Roger all in my SASE

Address used:

Seth MacFarlane
Family Guy Studios
c/o Fox Television
10201 West Pico Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90064
USA

Picture:

I was always curious if the "SM" was considered authenticate or secretarial? What do you think. What about the signature on the picture, are those believed to be real? I would love to get his auto.

jam92102 wrote:I was always curious if the "SM" was considered authenticate or secretarial? What do you think. What about the signature on the picture, are those believed to be real? I would love to get his auto.

Yeah I'm not sure. The one on the drawing is a photocopy. So it was real at a point, but it's been photocopied. So yeah, I'm not sure if the SM is real or not.

jam92102 wrote:I was always curious if the "SM" was considered authenticate or secretarial? What do you think. What about the signature on the picture, are those believed to be real? I would love to get his auto.

The SM is fake. I have his autograph too and i compared it to his real autograph its not even close. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Seth-MacFarlane ... 337861c065 Im so mad about it.

Hi caimenmasterson

Thank you for your feedback Great Success

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

Seth MacFarlane on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail

ChrisBrownsGirl21 wrote:

jam92102 wrote:I was always curious if the "SM" was considered authenticate or secretarial? What do you think. What about the signature on the picture, are those believed to be real? I would love to get his auto.

The SM is fake. I have his autograph too and i compared it to his real autograph its not even close. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Seth-MacFarlane ... 337861c065 Im so mad about it.

This one on ebay could be fake why do you trust it so much?

That is what he sends out as responses to all TTMs. Compared to an assumed in person and the wiki version they are all very different...

wiki example

IP example

skaboss241 wrote:

ChrisBrownsGirl21 wrote:

jam92102 wrote:I was always curious if the "SM" was considered authenticate or secretarial? What do you think. What about the signature on the picture, are those believed to be real? I would love to get his auto.

The SM is fake. I have his autograph too and i compared it to his real autograph its not even close. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Seth-MacFarlane ... 337861c065 Im so mad about it.

This one on ebay could be fake why do you trust it so much?

it has a damn certificate saying its real

Never trust eBay. the SM's that are added to people's items look nothing like his autograph. Whether it be a full IP he signs (as with the PP) or his most rushed signature, it's nothing like the SM.
I can speak, I've met him and watched him sign all sorts of signatures.

These secretaries know what they are doing. They make the autographs different on purpose so that the fakes these celebrities send out will never be put up for auction and sold by a major auction house. They can't stop them from being sold for online auctions though that don't check the authenticity of autographs before selling them.