Page 1 of 2

JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:55 pm
by Julia 13
Sent: December ( SASE, two photos)
Received: 26.01.2013 (my photos are not returned)
address:
Jude Law
Julian Belfrage Associates
9 Argyll Street
3rd Floor
London, W1F 7TG
UK

Image

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:59 pm
by Dante12
Cool! :) Congratulations! ;-)

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:12 pm
by Twelveby12
His standard PrePrints sadly.
RM

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:03 pm
by admin
Hi Julia 13 :)

Thank you for your feedback {up} Great Success :P

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

{star} Jude Law on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:42 pm
by Lorena
It's not preprint cause the signatures doesn't look the same in this case! So minimally one of the pics is signed personally by him!

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:44 pm
by James
Lorena wrote:It's not preprint cause the signatures doesn't look the same in this case! So minimally one of the pics is signed personally by him!
:lol:

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:45 pm
by Twelveby12
Lorena wrote:It's not preprint cause the signatures doesn't look the same in this case! So minimally one of the pics is signed personally by him!
I think you'll find they are, and that the argument you just presented is "How to prove it's not an AP".

Absolutely 100% Preprinted, in every way possible.

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:22 pm
by Lorena
Twelveby12 wrote:
Lorena wrote:It's not preprint cause the signatures doesn't look the same in this case! So minimally one of the pics is signed personally by him!
I think you'll find they are, and that the argument you just presented is "How to prove it's not an AP".

Absolutely 100% Preprinted, in every way possible.
The "Ju" is not the same so it's definitely not preprint, not both of them and AP either. I think if there's some doubt, so it could be eventually secretary!

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:24 pm
by trevor1066
Its a preprint

Re: JUDE LAW Success!

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:00 am
by Twelveby12
Lorena wrote:
Twelveby12 wrote:
Lorena wrote:It's not preprint cause the signatures doesn't look the same in this case! So minimally one of the pics is signed personally by him!
I think you'll find they are, and that the argument you just presented is "How to prove it's not an AP".

Absolutely 100% Preprinted, in every way possible.
The "Ju" is not the same so it's definitely not preprint, not both of them and AP either. I think if there's some doubt, so it could be eventually secretary!

Okay, I'm going to explain this slowly, as there seems to be some difficulty comprehending this.

1. Preprinted signatures on DIFFERENT photos are not required to be identical
2. Preprinted items come from a master, where the celebrity in question will have signed the original image which is then duplicated
3. In this case, Jude Law has signed two different images, both of which are used as PPs
4. In this case I am 100% sure of myself, for the simple reason these are the EXACT photos I received from Jude on the two occasions I have written to him, once via his agent, once via a film set

A simple check on this site alone will back it up. There are rare occasions when he does sign, but it doesn't take a genius to spot

This > http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 2&t=282936
This > http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 5&t=232328
and just preempt any claims that the second one might be genuine as it's different to those two
This > http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 5&t=229778

A little bit of research goes a long way.