Page 1 of 2
Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:59 pm
by zipbags
Got my custom card back signed for my daughters.
Mailed 2/12/13...Recv.3/9/13
Mailed to:Underarm
Studio 2
42 Westbourne Grove
London, W2 5SH
United Kingdom
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:35 am
by admin
Hi zipbags
Thank you for your feedback
Great Success
You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.
Hugh Grant on Fanmail.biz |
Previous Feedback(s) Received
Fanmail
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:49 pm
by Sparkly
Congrats! Didn't know that he signs ttm!
He has a very unique signature
I should try him soon!
Sparkly ?
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:32 pm
by trevor1066
Sparkly wrote:Congrats! Didn't know that he signs ttm!
Sparkly ?
He doesnt...
that sig is from his secretary
I received the same sec sig last week
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... &p=1173399
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:01 pm
by cutmemic
So because you recieved the same sig last week you assume its a sec sig ?
I dont understand people that jump to these abdurd conclusions with no factual basis .
You have absolutely no evidence that his secretary signed it , his butler signed it , his dog signed it or for that matter he signed it .
I would tend to lean towards him signing it due to the sloppy rushed nature of his sig.
If someone had to sign 100 plus items in a pile at a time one could assume they wouldnt take their time doing it or personalizing anything
Again it may not be his sig at all but until you can prove otherwise who is to say its not
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:52 pm
by trevor1066
cutmemic wrote:So because you recieved the same sig last week you assume its a sec sig ?
i dont assume anything.. i know!
I dont understand people that jump to these abdurd conclusions with no factual basis .
so who are you are you? are you hugh grant? and what does abdurd mean?
You have absolutely no evidence that his secretary signed it , his butler signed it , his dog signed it or for that matter he signed it .
nobody who posts ttm has any evidence at all, but some people arent as thick as you.
I would tend to lean towards him signing it due to the sloppy rushed nature of his sig.
I would lean towards thinking you havent a clue what your talking about pal.
If someone had to sign 100 plus items in a pile at a time one could assume they wouldnt take their time doing it or personalizing anything
what has personalizing it, got too do with this?
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:19 am
by BoeingGuy777
Trevor1066, where is your proof? What make you state that he didn't sign with such conviction?
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:44 am
by cutmemic
Ahhhh brilliantly crafted and well thought out responses Now I am convinced Trevor1066
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:53 am
by matula1977
This is interesting - I got exatly the same autograph as you and also sent back on the same date as you 05. 03. 2013 9:00pm - which is on the envelope. I posted it 26. 2. 2013 and got back today (I´m not from UK).
M.
Re: Hugh Grant success
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:36 pm
by luckyas13canbe
I've long had my doubts about Hugh Grant signatures, simply because of the number of different signatures which have come from "Hugh" over the years. I'm not sure, but I lean towards not being genuine.