Fanmail.biz

I think it was really nice of him to do that, too! Congrats!

etihwwons wrote:I think it was really nice of him to do that, too! Congrats!

Me too! Congrats!

My friend (I had it sent to her place for some reasons) is still holding mine hostage, lol!

do you want opinions on authenticity?

adzladz wrote:do you want opinions on authenticity?

It is a pre signed authentic photo... But sure let me know your opinions

I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

Please do elaborate on the "slight variations", I'd be delighted to see your research into this. Pretty crap AP machine if it changes the width of loops in both the initial "r" and the closing "e", not to mention completely removing the space in the "e" on the "with love" inscription.

Sometimes I fall about laughing when I read some of the posts on here. Such a complete lack of knowledge or (when it's a newbie who doesn't know better but thinks they do) a complete lack of common sense before making brash comments.

Hi SWfan27

Thank you for your feedback

Would you have a scan of the envelope you received please?
If so, you are in the run for the $10 gift certificate.

Richard Armitage on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail

luckyas13canbe wrote:

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

Please do elaborate on the "slight variations", I'd be delighted to see your research into this. Pretty **** AP machine if it changes the width of loops in both the initial "r" and the closing "e", not to mention completely removing the space in the "e" on the "with love" inscription.

Sometimes I fall about laughing when I read some of the posts on here. Such a complete lack of knowledge or (when it's a newbie who doesn't know better but thinks they do) a complete lack of common sense before making brash comments.

I was just saying my opinion.

adzladz wrote:

luckyas13canbe wrote:

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

Please do elaborate on the "slight variations", I'd be delighted to see your research into this. Pretty **** AP machine if it changes the width of loops in both the initial "r" and the closing "e", not to mention completely removing the space in the "e" on the "with love" inscription.

Sometimes I fall about laughing when I read some of the posts on here. Such a complete lack of knowledge or (when it's a newbie who doesn't know better but thinks they do) a complete lack of common sense before making brash comments.

I was just saying my opinion.

And your evidence is where....? Hence asking to see it, pretty straightforward I would think. If you're going to make allegations of non authentic signatures, then evidence is needed.