Page 1 of 2

Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:09 pm
by katefanmail9
Hello everyone :D ,

Today when I went out to my mailbox, I was pleasantly greeted by a great manila envelope containing a signed picture of Amanda Bynes!

What I sent: SAE, LOR, 1 photo
When I sent: July 18, 2014
Recieved: my photo signed on August 2, 2014!

Here are the links:
(autograph)

Image

(envelope)

Image

Thanks everyone :D {up} !

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:13 pm
by admin
Hi katefanmail9 :)

Thank you for your feedback {up}

Did you use this address please?:

Amanda Bynes
Chickiii Productions, Inc.
21031 Ventura Blvd.
Suite 1000
Woodland Hills, CA 91364-2227
USA

{star} Amanda Bynes on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:26 pm
by katefanmail9
Admin~ yes, I used that address {up}

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:28 am
by admin
Thanks {up}

Fanmail 8)

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 1:11 pm
by DistantAvalon
Is this her real signature or sec?

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:10 pm
by katefanmail9
Honestly, I'm not quite sure. All of the feedback I've seen with her recently have the same signature as mine, so I'm leaning on it being authentic. But you can never tell. :D

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:09 am
by Daniel_Lassiter
hmmbuh...amanda bynes coherent enough to sign autographs again? I'm not too sure, but let the "experts" of fanmail boards determine

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:03 pm
by DistantAvalon
Does anyone know what her IP signature looks like? I really want to send to her, but not if she sends out secs.

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:15 pm
by kaleykitty87
DistantAvalon wrote:Does anyone know what her IP signature looks like? I really want to send to her, but not if she sends out secs.
Personalized IP:

Image

Re: Amanda Bynes success!!

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:48 am
by Daniel_Lassiter
still a whackjob