Moderators...

Discussion of current events and participation in intelligent conversation with other Fanmail.biz users.
New Fanmail.biz Users: Introduce Yourself Here! 8)
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
khackdrums
Posts: 1084
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by khackdrums »

I agree, 100 moderators would be a lot. But realistically there is only half that number, at most, that are still active and that participate. The list just hasn’t been updated in a long time, that’s all. We've been after Admin for a while now to update the list. If Admin did this, you would see that the moderation team is actually only made up of 40-50 members max. For example, only 3 GM's are currently active (3/7). This is about the same ratio for both Mod's and TM's, roughly 40-50%. I think we are at a good number right now, we have just enough to effectively run this forum. We do a lot behind the scenes. We spend a lot of our own time improving this forum (catching spammers, deleting topics, moving topics, editing topics, locking topics, answering questions, etc.). We are all volunteers, no one is getting paid. I hope it's appreciated!

Khackdrums :D
Kyle :)

Image

DON'T TREAD ON ME! [us] PRIDE!

Grunge is Dead.
dfreely
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by dfreely »

Even 50 would still be excessive. I'm on forums with far, far more members and activity, and they operate smoothly with fewer moderators. If you actually think 50 is a "good number" and "just enough to effectively run the forum", then a lot of the moderators obviously don't deserve the job because it does not take that many to maintain a forum this size.
khackdrums
Posts: 1084
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by khackdrums »

It's being discussed, don't you worry about it.

Khackdrums :D
Kyle :)

Image

DON'T TREAD ON ME! [us] PRIDE!

Grunge is Dead.
mufcdd
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by mufcdd »

dfreely wrote:Even 50 would still be excessive. I'm on forums with far, far more members and activity, and they operate smoothly with fewer moderators. If you actually think 50 is a "good number" and "just enough to effectively run the forum", then a lot of the moderators obviously don't deserve the job because it does not take that many to maintain a forum this size.
Ive been saying this for 4 years, and I actually got banned as an Autograph Expert/Moderator for challenging admin on this numerous times.

95% of the TMs are pointless, and shouldnt be anywhere near a position of "power" as they let it go to their heads and ruin threads.
CLICK BELOW TO SEE MY TWITTER PAGE! OVER 10,000 FOLLOWERS!
Image
beecs
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by beecs »

Well thank you for your thoughts on the matter, I have been an active and quite helpful member (I think) in that time. Well Fingers crossed!

Cheers,
-Rebecca :D
Ryco11757
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1471
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 11:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by Ryco11757 »

i was a TM for 3 days and i got removed as one Because someone Falsely accused me of cursing at someone guestbook!!! really dumb...but i hope you do become one {up}
beecs
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by beecs »

Ryco11757 wrote:i was a TM for 3 days and i got removed as one Because someone Falsely accused me of cursing at someone guestbook!!! really dumb...but i hope you do become one {up}
Aww thank you, I accepted you on Facebook!
dfreely
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by dfreely »

mufcdd wrote:Ive been saying this for 4 years, and I actually got banned as an Autograph Expert/Moderator for challenging admin on this numerous times. 95% of the TMs are pointless, and shouldnt be anywhere near a position of "power" as they let it go to their heads and ruin threads.
Sometimes you have to wonder whether this forum is a dictatorship, or inmates running the asylum. A moderation team should be about quality, not quantity.
beecs wrote:Well thank you for your thoughts on the matter, I have been an active and quite helpful member (I think) in that time. Well Fingers crossed!
beecs, do know that absolutely none of this negativity is directed towards you. It's just the system.
beecs
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by beecs »

Right lol
Thanks :D

You can all use this thread to discuss it further

Cheers,
-Rebecca :D
osiris
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Moderators...

Unread post by osiris »

Please be aware that the majority of the moderation team have the same feelings dfreely, but our attempts to improve the forum are largely ignored and we must work with the system Admin has put in place. We do as best we can.
Favourite: David Tennant IP, John Barrowman IP, Patrick Stewart IP, Catherine Tate VV.
Newest: John Simm IP, Suranne Jones IP, Jonathan Groff IP.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests