Fanmail.biz

yellowblue wrote:Well....

1) You've been banned over a dozen times anyway and shouldnt be a TM in any case.

2) Over half your posts are nothing more than "congrats/well done" posts.

3) You spam the board on a daily basis, usually over 20 of these pointless "well done!!" messages, and quite frankly Im stunned a Mod/GM hasnt come down on you hard for this, seeing as its something they usually jump on pretty fast.

4) As for your "shock", I dont know why you'd say that. You've psoted similar stuff on this forum before on several of your banned accounts, so its not exactly out of character for you is it?

So regardless of whether you did, or didnt post those things (and judging by your past behaviour, I wouldnt be surprised if you did), never in a million years should you even be close to being a TM, and therefore you shouldnt be complaining about being stripped of TM status.

yellowblue wrote:

Ryco11757 wrote: what is wrong with saying congrats? alot of people say congrats on the fourm, the point is that i did not write in her guestbook, i would never say the things that that person said. what i mean by look at my post is that, im not a mean/rude person. i try to help and be nice

-Ryan

1) Read my post again. Nothing wrong with saying congrats. But doing it to the extent that you do (20+ times every single day) is nothing more than spam, designed to falsely increase your post count.

2) You're "not a mean/rude person", sorry, I disagree. I was here when your first 12+ accounts were all banned, and the abuse you posted (and PM'd) quite clearly shows that you are indeed rude/mean. Any of the Mods/GMs who can remember that (and there are several of them) will also already know this is a cast iron fact.

yellowblue wrote:

afterffectsmad wrote:He has been a very helpful mod to me he has answered all my nubby questions and also informed me if my autograph was authentic ot not

i would just like to say hes a really good mod and i hope he stays

He may have been helpful to you but that doesnt change anything Ive stated. Plus he doesnt know anything much about authenticity at all, he just searches the forum for old opinions, then copies them! Hardly worth having his "opinion" IMO.

Edit - Ive just checked your posts, and hes only responded to you once, when you claimed your Gordon Ramsey was "prepen" (obvious error, you clearly meant autopen), and he responded saying "Its not preprint, its AP", when you never said preprint anyway. SO if thats him being "really helpful and telling you if something is authentic or not", then seriously, ask other people for some REAL help on the subject.