Page 1 of 3
Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:10 pm
by johnnylightning
Whenever i read a success but the person writes no pics i have no scanner or camera i am always a bit annoyed and dissapointed,i am not saying people shouldnt post successes who cant take pictures of them or scan them i just find it annoying and don't think it should be recorded as a success without proof.I know not everyone can afford a camera or scanner and still love the hobby and want to share their success and thats fine im not trying to cause a arguement here i just always like to see the pictures and need proof so i know it is legit and the address is good.Anyone who has an opinion can comment just don't start any fights about it...

Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:13 pm
by Paigey012
I love seeing pictures of peoples successes too
Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:56 pm
by khackdrums
I agree, pictures are nice. I will not send to an address unless there are past successes, with pictures.
Khackdrums

Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:05 pm
by dfreely
I am quite lazy, so I'll usually only post pictures for celebrities that may not be as popular, just so future senders will have some level of feedback. For the more famous celebrities that already have a lot of feedback, I generally don't bother posting a picture.. or even posting at all.
Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:16 pm
by DanaRenoMBA
I do not post pictures, and never will. I have collected autographs for nearly forty years and only allow authentic autographs in my collection. Having been in the hobby so long I have learned the difference and people that know me take me at my word. If someone wants to discount my posts that is there loss not mine. If anyone looks at my previous posts they will see that when I question the authenticity of a signature, I relate that informarion, and post pre-prints etc as "failures."
Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:46 pm
by omgitscaro
I just knew this conversation would come up. So here's my opinion.
So I'm lazy, and sometimes I don't like to plug up my camera/webcam and post pics. If you don't believe me, I don't care. If there's already proof, why waste time and see more pics?

Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:29 pm
by SophieBooty
I sometimes don't take pictures either,
People either believe you, or they don't,
It's up to them {thumb2}
Sophie
Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:51 pm
by RYAN J.
I ALWAYS post scans of my successes!!

And I do them on a high-quality scanner too, so they look good. So you'll never have to worry about checking out my successes they will always be photos! And I even label them so there a breeze to save in an autograph examples folder if you have one. {thumb2}
RYAN J.

Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:33 pm
by musicfan
Some OF The Ppl On This Forum Post That They Got DEMI....SELENA...And Jonas Bros..ALL IN THE SAME DAY And I CALL THEY LIARS Cuz There is NO PICS....I Believe That Of U Dnt Post Pics....Then ITs Very SUSPICIOUS...Thats My Opinion...lol.
Re: Posting successes without pictures ... ?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:39 pm
by dfreely
Why would people lie anyways..? It's of no benefit to anyone.