The original poster did not ask for opinions on the autograph she received so what gives him the right to tell her that he thinks its secreterial? I'll probably get a

TheMailman

Although his opinion was unwarranted by the original poster, it's nothing to get annoyed over. It's probably not at the stage to lock the thread yet, but if it gets any more out of hand I will.Andy316 wrote:While I see your point, the inscription has been done with a completely different pen, which suggests the inscription is secretarial. The actual autograph may not be though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest