Page 1 of 1

Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 1:27 pm
by RuleroftheWorld
About a year ago I got a success from the porn star Silvia Saint. I posted the success, it was then deleted by a GM (I forget who) with the reasoning that this is a family site etc, which seems fair enough. I actually deleted someone's Jenna Jameson success a couple weeks ago for this reason, as I thought it was an unwritten rule.

But today someone posts a success from the porn star Ron Jeremy and admin posts and says "thanks for your feedback"

Am I missing something here? Are male pornstars allowed feedback but not female ones?

And yes, this is in the Mod forum for a reason, so dont go moving it ;-)

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 2:47 pm
by MW1221
admin hasn't been really on the side of the mods/GMs lately.

It could be that this was a rule, but like all others on this site, was changed without any of us being informed of it... :?

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 4:59 pm
by Larisie
I can understand your confusion, however did you post a picture with your success Andy? 'Cuz I think admin doesn't have a problem with it as long as there's no picture or the picture posted is appropriate for the site. Although that's just what I gather from it. :|

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:51 pm
by ldy josie x
Larisie wrote:I can understand your confusion, however did you post a picture with your success Andy? 'Cuz I think admin doesn't have a problem with it as long as there's no picture or the picture posted is appropriate for the site. Although that's just what I gather from it. :|
That seems reasonable (and I was going to say the same thing too :) )

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 5:51 pm
by RuleroftheWorld
Larisie wrote:I can understand your confusion, however did you post a picture with your success Andy? 'Cuz I think admin doesn't have a problem with it as long as there's no picture or the picture posted is appropriate for the site. Although that's just what I gather from it. :|
I posted a link to the pic (not with IMG tags, just a direct link to the image on my site), but if it was just the pic that was the problem, then surely the link could've just been removed? :?

This is the pic - http://www.andy316.fpic.co.uk/p43316281.html - is it inappropriate?

Because the pics below (that Ive posted as successes) have been fine and not been removed -
http://www.andy316.fpic.co.uk/p46334832.html
http://www.andy316.fpic.co.uk/p46334833.html

If anything, those last 2 pics would have much more reason to get the thread gone..

Just doesnt seem to be any consistency :neutral:

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 2:11 am
by Larisie
I do find your pictures to be inappropriate, since it's supposed to be "family friendly" and what not. But then again that doesn't make much sense if your one post got deleted and not the other when it's (imo) just as bad. *shrugs* Definitely makes no sense to me.

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:36 am
by scouser#1
Are porn stars even classed as celebrities, i mean considering what they do and all that :lol:
As for the photo andy some people might find it inappropirate and some might not, i don't find it that bad seeing as though you have covered her up abit.

Re: Completely, utterly, totally confused

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:53 am
by nowandagain
Hi everyone :D

My reasoning is that admin probably hasn't realised that Ron is actually an adult porn star.

I do agree that such successes shouldn't be posted, given that there are many members here who are underage.

I'll have the thread locked and moved to this forum.

nowandagain [rockon]


P.S. I noticed that there was no mention in the thread that Ron was a pornstar, so this may have been one of the reasons it was overlooked.