Page 1 of 1
Demote "canterquen2" and "dramagrl3"?
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:09 am
by rpbluesman
Hi all
I was just looking over our moderator roster and noticed that canterqueen2 and dramagrl3 haven't posted since April.
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/profile.p ... ile&u=3188 (dramagrl3)
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/profile.p ... ile&u=3327 (canterqueen2)
I was thinking that maybe we should demote them, and then do the process of re-evaluation if they were to appear again?
Any thoughts?
Daniel
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:59 am
by nowandagain
Not a bad idea Daniel
I think it would be a good idea if we set some sort of guidelines regarding absent moderators - e.g. if a moderator doesn't post within a certain period without a valid reason (such as 6 months) that they can be demoted.
So far, both canterqueen2 and dramagrl3 haven't posted in around 5 months ... so maybe we could give them another month before officially demoting them? Otherwise we can demote them now and review their position when they return.
nowandagain [rockon]
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:13 am
by Chrissy
I absolutely agree. There are a few moderators that haven't posted in a while. It's a good idea because there could be other potential moderators on the forum that would be good to replace them on the thread(s). If they come back; like both of you have said, we can see how well they start to do.
Thanks for bringing it up Daniel
Chrissy
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:39 am
by admin
I removed their rank. Thanks Daniel
Fanmail
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:54 am
by TheCollector
Hi guys
When we "rejigged" the ranks recently we did remove about 5 moderators who hadn't posted for a while. The criteria we used there was basically anyone who hasn't posted in 6 months
I think this is probably a decent / fair time length - what do you think?
Ian
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:59 am
by admin
Oops, maybe 3 months is a too short
Thanks Ian
Fanmail
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:52 pm
by nowandagain
TheCollector wrote:The criteria we used there was basically anyone who hasn't posted in 6 months
I think this is probably a decent / fair time length - what do you think?
6 months sounds like a decent time frame (that is, unless they have a valid reason)
nowandagain [rockon]
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:53 pm
by ozzman
I agree six months is just about right.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:15 am
by rpbluesman
As do I. 6 months is a good time to allow for problems to be resolved.
Of course, if they have a good reason, then by all means we shall overlook the situation.