Page 1 of 1

Hugh Jackman Success

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:40 pm
by NoWearMan
He signed one of my two cards I sent but sent one of his own PP. I'd much rather had my other card signed. Oh well, I got one...I'm happy.

Sent: 12/02/09
Recd: 02/03/10
days: 63

I used the Broadway Address for "Steady Rain" No longer Running

Mine:
Image

His:
Image

Re: Hugh Jackman Success

Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:01 pm
by admin
Hi NoWearMan :)

Thank you for your feedback {up} and congrats on your success :mrgreen:

Fanmail 8)

Re: Hugh Jackman Success

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:51 am
by mymymy
are they both PP/Autopens tho, even on ur pic?

Re: Hugh Jackman Success

Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:58 pm
by NoWearMan
the signature on my card seems to be authentic. You can see where he set the pen down then lifted it back up. the pen strokes are darker in that area. PP's and stamps don't do that.

Re: Hugh Jackman Success

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:44 am
by dansautos
NoWearMan wrote:the signature on my card seems to be authentic. You can see where he set the pen down then lifted it back up. the pen strokes are darker in that area. PP's and stamps don't do that.
You're right PP and stamps won't have signs of someone signing it. However, autopens do because autopens literally use a machine that makes the signature with whatever pen/marker you put in. This appears to be an autopen, albeit one that was poorly done because it looks like the card slipped in the middle of the signature. You can see how evenly the lines are, and how the curves look like a series of short straight lines (which is something that old autopens do).