PATRICK DEMPSEY AUTHENTIC SUCCESS!!

[chelseac92]

FINALLY HERE IT IS:



AND



i sent him the pics and he signed them

can you please give me ur input!

what do you think? secreterial or authentic? please, it means a lot to me !

:)thanks

[Dallas]

I have reasons as to why they could be secretarial and authentic, but I'm leaning towards secretarial.

The signatures look a little "drawn" to me like a secretary was copying it from a real signature, since you can see pen breaks.

It might be authentic if he was walking and someone brought them up to him because his hand might have tilted or it could be rushed.

Since my authentic reason is probably unlikely I am gonna stick with secs.

Too bad, but now I won't waste my high quality pictures on a sec sig.

[Chris102]

Great success, chelseac92!

[TheMailman]

I think they're possibly authentic.



Although it is rather different, they do resemble each other. Look at the way the P and D start.

Or it could be a poorly attempt at copying Patrick's autograph.

But why would Patrick have a secretary sign them if he is with SFM?

TheMailman

[chelseac92]

Thank you everyone for all of your feedback

im still not sure, and I loved getting all of your opinions If anyone has anymore, I would love it.

i thought the same thing mailman-i didnt understand why he'd have a secretery sign it if hes with SFM, it wouldnt make sense. but then again they do look quite different.

i think hed just send me a PP though if he didnt have time to sign it, you'd think.

hmmm...very confusing. maybe he signed quickly? who knows. I wish someone was psychic or i wish i could call up patrick dempsey and ask hahah

again, any other input is appreciated. THANKS EVERYONE!

[chelseac92]

also, does anyone have any in person or authentic ttm autographs of his? I've only seen his preprints, so maybe if i were to see another one of his signatures, perhaps it'd look more similar to the one i got or more different or something.

also, again, if anyone wants to add their opinions, please go right ahead